You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox

Wittenoon Shutterstock 720432496 Cropped

Stunning verdict

Though reeling from its initial loss in the Wally Simpson case, Slater and Gordon took heart from a vital test case win in Melbourne. In a stunning verdict, Wittenoom victim Klaus Rabenalt was awarded $426,000 damages for negligence, plus $257,000 exemplary damages. It was the first verdict for a former Wittenoom employee, and the first time in a British or Australian court that a company had been punished to such an extent for reckless indifference to the health of its workers.

The first victory for the new Perth office came in the case of Colin Watson, a wharf worker who loaded asbestos in the 1950s. In 1987, burdened with bottled oxygen and a fatal diagnosis, he approached Slater and Gordon to sue the Minister for Transport.

In the first successful WA claim by an asbestos sufferer, Colin was awarded $461,800. An appeal, mainly on the ground that the plaintiff’s injury was not foreseeable, rebounded in the government’s face. The WA Full Supreme Court ruled that damages be increased to $567,800.

In early 1988, with momentum building, the Perth office took up the causes of Wittenoom veterans Peter Heys and Tim Barrow. Both men had advanced mesothelioma, with Heys dying while his case was still being heard.

On August 4, 1988, Justice Barry Rowland handed down a devastating judgement against CSR. He found that the WA Public Service and CSR had been aware of the dangers of asbestos in the 1930s and ‘40s. It was reasonably foreseeable, he said, that workers ‘were at risk of contracting a serious disease.’

Peter Heys’ family won $116,000 damages. Tim Barrow, awarded $216,000, died two months later. The huge costs of the case, nearly $600,000 on the plaintiffs’ side, naturally went against CSR.

Csr Cropped
Source: Financial Review, Thursday 22 September 1988

The tide begins to turn

At last Slater and Gordon’s efforts seemed to have won considerable court approval. The verdicts set a precedent for the settlement of hundreds of other cases in WA.

In September 1988, CSR made its first individual offers of settlement, to four men dying of mesothelioma. In a series of face-saving newspaper advertisements, the company said the remaining claims ‘should be settled speedily on humanitarian grounds.’

There were wry smiles at Slater and Gordon and the Asbestos Diseases Society, who had been trying for years to get CSR to the negotiating table.

On April 5, 1989, CSR and the WA State Government Insurance Commission (SGIC) signed an unprecedented open-ended deal, committing the two organisations to share in compensation payments to all Wittenoom workers who suffered asbestos-type illnesses in the past or future. It was expected that about $20 million would be paid to 100 survivors who worked at Wittenoom up to 1958, with $30 million to those who worked there after that time.

Wittenoom Town Cropped

Tempers flare

But in private negotiations, CSR’s lawyer’s made nonsense of the glowing promises. Tempers flared with Slater and Gordon of the firm view that the pittance offered by the company was in no way acceptable reparation for victims’ pain and suffering.

Slater and Gordon called a media conference, declaring the CSR lawyers’ offers to be ‘not in good faith at all’. But despite the renewal of adverse publicity for CSR, only about 50 claims could be settled on a reasonable basis.

Left with several difficult cases, Slater and Gordon sought to settle them in one hit. The Firm launched proceedings in Perth, Melbourne and Sydney on one day, forcing CSR to confront the enormity of the problem.

In June 1989, Slater and Gordon proposed to CSR’s lawyers a ‘global settlement’, based on resolved Wittenoom claims, to establish an average settlement figure. The alternative of pursuing every individual claim through the courts would have been a disaster for CSR.

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

Thank you for your feedback.

Latest blog posts

Wittenoom - a toxic time bomb

The ghost town of Wittenoom has more than its fair share of ghosts. A booming mining hub in the 1950s and 1960s, it occupies a tragic place in history as the site of Australia’s deadliest industrial disaster. The story of this toxic time-bomb is one of denial in the boardroom, and heartbreak in hospital wards. And though Wittenoom’s asbestos dust may have settled, its legacy lingers as a cautionary tale for all. Slater and Gordon entered the saga in the mid-1980s, when Yvonne Adam asked the firm to represent her husband Ray, who worked at Wittenoom back in 1948. Ray was gravely ill with lung disease, and Yvonne wanted some recompense from the owner of the mines. That owner was...

Asbestos Wittenoom
Compensation Law
Are we creating a fourth wave of asbestos exposure?

A new wave of asbestos exposure may potentially be emerging in Australia, as we continue to deal with the tragic consequences of the first, second and third waves. Initially, mineworkers who were exposed to asbestos in mines developed lung diseases and mesothelioma. Then, tradespeople working directly with asbestos products and asbestos started to become sick as well. The third and most recent wave has seen home renovators (including wives and children who lent a hand or helped clean up) develop dust-related diseases. In the wake of the discovery that asbestos building products were used in the construction of the Perth Children’s Hospital, a new focus needs to be placed on imported...

Compensation Law
The rise of asbestos related disease in mechanics and car enthusiasts

Asbestos is an insidious part of Australia’s history. Touted as the material of the future it was widely used in building products during the second half of the 20th century and those who worked with the material, and their families, have been dealing with the fallout ever since. However, what is less known is how widespread its use was in cars and car parts. What has concerned us in recent years, is an upward trend in the number of enquiries from mechanics who have been exposed to asbestos through car parts, such as brake pads. Asbestos-related diseases can take years to manifest and this troubling rise appears to result from asbestos exposure in mechanics and home car enthusiasts...

Mechanic Cropped

We're here to help

Start your online claim check now. Or, if you have a question, get in touch with our team.