You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox

Mechanic Cropped

Asbestos is an insidious part of Australia’s history. Touted as the material of the future it was widely used in building products during the second half of the 20th century and those who worked with the material, and their families, have been dealing with the fallout ever since.

However, what is less known is how widespread its use was in cars and car parts. What has concerned us in recent years, is an upward trend in the number of enquiries from mechanics who have been exposed to asbestos through car parts, such as brake pads.

Asbestos-related diseases can take years to manifest and this troubling rise appears to result from asbestos exposure in mechanics and home car enthusiasts several decades ago who worked with and replaced various car and motor parts containing the dangerous substance.

Over the past two years I have seen a 200 per cent rise in the number of former mechanics who have sought legal support, which is why it is fundamental that people understand the risks associated with working on older cars.

Why mechanics?

Typically, mechanics were exposed to asbestos when replacing brake pads and clutches and using compressed air to remove dust that had accumulated. Surprisingly asbestos was still being used in auto parts such as brake pads as recently as the early 2000s.

A possible reason for the recent rise in enquiries could be that around 40 years ago, society moved from one-car families to two-car families with many adding “that other run-around” vehicle.

Prior to the introduction of the computerised car systems we are now used to, simpler engines and parts meant that it was fairly easy for car enthusiasts to fix that run around vehicle at home, thus avoiding the cost of paying a mechanic.

As a result there is also a risk for home mechanics who worked on cars in the past and who are working on older cars now.

Asbestos

Asbestos-related diseases, such as mesothelioma, pleural disease, asbestosis and lung cancer, can develop up to four decades after the initial exposure.

Asbestos becomes a potential risk to health if fibres become airborne and are breathed into the lungs, potentially leading to a number of extremely serious conditions.

Because asbestos-related illnesses tend not to show for decades, we are only now starting to see and understand the real impact.

It really doesn’t take a lot of exposure to asbestos for someone to potentially develop a life-threatening disease.

Due to the long tail of these diseases it’s important that if you believe you have been exposed that you register the details of that exposure as soon as possible. Years later, it can be very difficult to remember the details of where, when and how you were exposed.

Register your exposure via our Asbestos register

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

Related blog posts

Is a delayed diagnosis medical negligence?

An estimated 140,000 cases of diagnostic errors happen in Australia every year. The reality is that medicine is a complex field and people who work in healthcare are still humans that can make mistakes. If you’ve walked out of a doctor’s appointment feeling like your symptoms were dismissed or a test wasn’t ordered on time, it makes sense to ask yourself whether you’re experiencing poor treatment or even medical negligence.  Delayed diagnosis happens when your medical condition is identified much later than it should have been based on a reasonable standard of care. This delay can cause your condition to worsen which can make treatment much more difficult.  The law doesn't say a...

Med negligence blog woman sitting in appointment
Justice for survivors of institutional child abuse in New South Wales

A recent High Court ruling, together with changes to legislation in New South Wales, has fundamentally changed the legal landscape for survivors of institutional child abuse. Victim-survivors who were abused in institutions now have clearer, stronger pathways to seek justice and compensation. Institutions are now much more likely to be held liable for abuse perpetrated by people acting in positions of authority and care. The Court clarified that when an institution places a child in someone’s care, it has a legal responsibility to ensure reasonable care is taken. This means that institutions can no longer hide behind arguments that the abuse was purely the criminal act of an individual. ...

Image high court of australia
Justice for survivors of institutional child abuse

A recent High Court ruling, together with changes to legislation in Victoria and the ACT, has fundamentally changed the legal landscape for survivors of institutional child abuse. Victim-survivors who were abused in institutions now have clearer, stronger pathways to seek justice and compensation. In the past, victim-survivors were unable to pursue compensation for child abuse if the abuser was not technically a formal employee. This left a loophole where institutions could escape accountability for the actions of people they placed in positions of trust and power. “Vicarious liability” is when a person or organisation is held legally responsible for the wrongful or criminal acts of...

Image high court of australia

We're here to help

Start your online claim check now. Or, if you have a question, get in touch with our team.