You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox


A new wave of asbestos exposure may potentially be emerging in Australia, as we continue to deal with the tragic consequences of the first, second and third waves.

Initially, mineworkers who were exposed to asbestos in mines developed lung diseases and mesothelioma. Then, tradespeople working directly with asbestos products and asbestos started to become sick as well.

The third and most recent wave has seen home renovators (including wives and children who lent a hand or helped clean up) develop dust-related diseases.

In the wake of the discovery that asbestos building products were used in the construction of the Perth Children’s Hospital, a new focus needs to be placed on imported building materials.

In recent years we have seen increased concerns around products imported from overseas, where safety standards aren’t necessarily as high as Australia.

There are calls from unions and industry bodies for Australian compliance testing regimes to be tightened and the number of prosecutions to be stepped up.

As trade becomes easier and Australia becomes more reliant on other countries to import building materials, enhanced monitoring of building products coming from overseas becomes crucial. Asbestos needs to be stopped at the border. Slater and Gordon lawyer Nicole Valenti notes the potential threats of asbestos building materials unknowingly entering the country are serious and alarming.

Mesothelioma, a terminal cancer caused by exposure to asbestos, takes on average almost 40 years to develop from first exposure and by that time, people may not remember where they came into contact with the material.

We need to make sure that everyone understands the dangers of importing asbestos materials into this country and that we have tight controls, or we could find the next generation of Australians trying to outrun a fourth wave of asbestos exposure.

Recalling the dates, times and places of exposure to asbestos will become harder as more years go by and you may need to pin point with some degree of accuracy those details at some time in the future. So, if you or anyone you know has been exposed please consider registration with the database below. It is also important to discuss a potential exposure with your General Practitioner so it is recorded.

There is a National register run by the Government which can be found here: Government Registry <https://www.asbestossafety.gov.au/national-asbestos-exposure-register>

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

Related blog posts

Is a delayed diagnosis medical negligence?

An estimated 140,000 cases of diagnostic errors happen in Australia every year. The reality is that medicine is a complex field and people who work in healthcare are still humans that can make mistakes. If you’ve walked out of a doctor’s appointment feeling like your symptoms were dismissed or a test wasn’t ordered on time, it makes sense to ask yourself whether you’re experiencing poor treatment or even medical negligence.  Delayed diagnosis happens when your medical condition is identified much later than it should have been based on a reasonable standard of care. This delay can cause your condition to worsen which can make treatment much more difficult.  The law doesn't say a...

Med negligence blog woman sitting in appointment
Justice for survivors of institutional child abuse in New South Wales

A recent High Court ruling, together with changes to legislation in New South Wales, has fundamentally changed the legal landscape for survivors of institutional child abuse. Victim-survivors who were abused in institutions now have clearer, stronger pathways to seek justice and compensation. Institutions are now much more likely to be held liable for abuse perpetrated by people acting in positions of authority and care. The Court clarified that when an institution places a child in someone’s care, it has a legal responsibility to ensure reasonable care is taken. This means that institutions can no longer hide behind arguments that the abuse was purely the criminal act of an individual. ...

Image high court of australia
Justice for survivors of institutional child abuse

A recent High Court ruling, together with changes to legislation in Victoria and the ACT, has fundamentally changed the legal landscape for survivors of institutional child abuse. Victim-survivors who were abused in institutions now have clearer, stronger pathways to seek justice and compensation. In the past, victim-survivors were unable to pursue compensation for child abuse if the abuser was not technically a formal employee. This left a loophole where institutions could escape accountability for the actions of people they placed in positions of trust and power. “Vicarious liability” is when a person or organisation is held legally responsible for the wrongful or criminal acts of...

Image high court of australia

We're here to help

Start your online claim check now. Or, if you have a question, get in touch with our team.