You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox

1. Seeing your children is not your legal right

The most common misconception in family law is that parents have a right to see their children. They don’t. Family Law does not recognise any right of a parent to see a child. It does, however, recognise that a child has a right to have both parents and other significant adults in their lives. The law believes that children benefit from having important people in their lives as role models. This works in your favour when arguing for spending time with your own children.

2. It’s the everyday parenting that counts

It’s tempting to want all the ‘fun’ moments with your children, but parenting is a 24/7 job and meaningful, joyful relationships with your children are built as much around the breakfast table and the before-bed routine as they are on entertaining day activities or trips away. The law considers that a parent’s involvement should be in all aspects of their children’s lives, both the exciting and the humdrum. The Court therefore favours orders that provide for both weekday and weekend time with each parent.

3. The Court considers practicality

Again, all things being equal, a child should be able to spend equal time with both parents and have them equally involved in all the different aspects of their lives. The time the Court will order has to be reasonably practicable. For example, travelling long distances to school may be neither practical nor in the best interests of a child.

4. The Court considers the child’s best interests

In the same way that you as a parent only want the best for your child, the Court’s decision needs to be something which is in the child’s best interests. For example, unacceptable risks of abuse or harm to the child would outweigh the benefit the child would have from the contact with a parent.

5. Relatives other than parents

If, for no very good reason, grandparents or other relatives are being excluded from the child’s life, the Court recognises that it is of benefit for a child to have that person in their life and allows Applications to be made for orders to see children by grandparents and others.

6. Withdrawal of the right to see your child: a last resort

As the law does not recognise a parent’s right to spend time with the children, Courts have the power to remove a parent from the child’s life if the child’s welfare requires it. However, the underlying belief that it is good for children to have contact with both parents, means this is a measure of last resort.

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

Thank you for your feedback.

Related blog posts

Family Law
Is your inheritance protected?

Once you have made the choice to separate, it is likely you have started the difficult process of deciding how to divide your assets. For most people, this process begins with a ‘yours’ and ‘mine’ approach, whereby you separate assets into certain baskets depending on who they belong to. Regardless of your process, it is vital at this stage to receive legal advice to ascertain exactly what it is you are entitled to. It is possible what you want, and what you are entitled to, may be two very different realities. The Family Law Act gives the family courts broad discretion to make orders in relation to financial cases, including orders for dividing assets between parties. Whether you...

Istock 476824114 Blog
Family Law
Four key facts you need to know about your property settlement

When a marriage or a de facto relationship ends, the parties need to finalise their financial ties with one another. This may involve the transfer of ownership of real estate, cash, superannuation or other property from one party to another. For example, if the matrimonial home is in joint names the parties may agree that the house be sold and the proceeds divided. Alternatively, the parties may agree that one party receives the house and makes a cash payment of some nature to the other party to ‘buy out’ their interest. When you are separating, it is important to get legal advice from a Solicitor specialising in family law, in order to determine your entitlements. Any agreement reached...

105625090 Blog
Family Law
Can I change the locks?

“Can I change the locks?” – This must be one of the most common questions addressed by any family lawyer. The simple answer to whether a party going through separation can change the locks on a property they are living in is usually “yes”. If there is no court order which affects that person’s right to occupy the property, then in most circumstances there is little prohibiting a party from changing the locks. However the position can differ slightly depending on, which party legally owns the property. Where the property is owned by both parties Where the property is owned by one party Where the property is leased to you In all circumstances Perhaps the question asked should not...

Istock 475237296 Blog

We're here to help

Start your online claim check now. Or, if you have a question, get in touch with our team.