Posted on 29 Nov 2019
30 years of the NSW Dust Diseases Tribunal

State Practice Group Leader

On 1 November 1989 Judge John O’Meally sat for the first time in the New South Wales Dust Diseases Tribunal (the “Tribunal”) when it heard its first case. This month, during Asbestos Awareness Month the Tribunal celebrated 30 years of operation.
The Tribunal was created by the NSW Parliament after years of long delays in the Supreme Court and District Court which often saw plaintiffs suffering from dust diseases die before their cases could be heard. During the Second Reading Speech on 3 May 1989, Mr Dowd, the then NSW Attorney General said:
Honourable members will be aware of the considerable delays that exist in the common law jurisdictions of both the Supreme Court and the District Court, which this Government inherited. Delays, of course, are particularly critical for plaintiffs with dust diseases, such as mesothelioma, which have a long latency period, but once diagnosed, result in rapid deterioration and usually lead to death within 12 to 18 months. The Government is committed to these claims being deal with expeditiously by the creation of a separate tribunal that will provide a fast-track mechanism.
This new court was given powers to fix the times and places for holding its proceedings, the power to adjourn proceedings, to enforce judgments, and the power to dispense with the rules of evidence when matters are not in dispute and to authorize the taking of evidence outside the tribunal, leading to many bedside hearings taking the evidence of dying plaintiffs at their homes and at their bed sides in hospital. There were times when the Tribunal sat into the night to hear evidence and give judgements. There were times when it sat on Christmas Eve and Boxing Day.
In 1998 there were further amendments to the legislation. Prior to this change if a plaintiff died before their case was finished then their entitlement to damages for pain and suffering was extinguished. The NSW Parliament recognized this and Mr Yeadon who gave the Second Reading Speech in 1998 commented that:
... claimants are in effect often engaged in a race against time to have their pain and suffering damages claim finalized before death, for the benefit of their family. Despite commendable efforts by the tribunal to expeditated hearings, a number of death-bed hearings have resulted, with claimant in extreme situations struggling to complete their evidence. The bill aims to adopt a more humane approach. It provides that where a person with proceedings pending begore the Dust Diseases Tribunal dies from a dust-related condition, the person’s estate can pursue recovery of the damage’s entitlements from the deceased’s person’s pain and suffering.
Since 1989 the Tribunal has heard many thousands of cases of people suffering dust diseases including malignant mesothelioma from asbestos exposure where the average life expectancy has not change from 30 years ago and remains at 12 months. Mesothelioma is a devastating disease and since 1986, the 5-year relative survival rate has remained stable at around 5.5%. Australia continues to have one of the highest measured incident rates of mesothelioma in the world and we continue to see 700-800 diagnoses of mesothelioma throughout Australia each year[i]. Thirty years later and The Tribunal continues to hold bed side hearings and to expedite claims for asbestos sufferers when required.
Every day two Australians are diagnosed with mesothelioma, an incurable disease with a very poor prognosis.
The dangers of asbestos are still prevalent throughout our society. Asbestos building products remain in 1 out of every 3 of our homes and it is important that we continue to raise awareness of the continuing dangers of exposure to asbestos.
[i] Mesothelioma in Australia 2018, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 28 August 2019
The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.