You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox

Family

I have been practicing medical law for more than two decades and I am still shocked every time someone comes to me alleging their doctor missed a cancer diagnosis.

It is unforgivable and should not happen. The incidence and severity of breast cancer is thrust into our faces every day, when we turn on a television or radio, open up a newspaper, when we watch sport and when our kids play it.

The awareness around this hideous disease is prolific and has directly and positively influenced the number of women receiving regular mammograms.

So when women visit a doctor, they rightly expect to receive the best possible care.

There should be no trick to testing for breast cancer. With the technology we have available today, missing a tumour is like a footballer missing a goal from one metre out.

Over the past few months I have spoken to five women and the sister of another whose breast cancer diagnosis was missed.

Each story is different but each shares similar details.

Either the doctor didn’t do the right test, the test was not comprehensive or the test was incorrectly reviewed.

The last of these three is particularly concerning. If it is true, this alleged breast cancer expert was unable to competently look at a scan and identify a tumour – how can we expect women to trust the information they receive?

In short, they shouldn’t.

And what is particularly tragic is that many of the women I am seeing are mothers with young children whose lives may or will be cut short as a result of the delay.

Whether it’s breast cancer, heart disease or even skin disorders, if a patient feels like the treatment they have received is not right, they should never hesitate in getting a second opinion.

At the time, the thought of going to another doctor might seem like you're overdoing it, but it really could mean the difference between life and death as I have seen in recent cases.

Anne Shortall
Principal Lawyer, Medical Negligence
Slater and Gordon

No Win No Fee

We offer a No Win, No Fee* arrangement. This means that if you don’t win, you don’t pay the fees for the work we do on your case!

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

Related blog posts

Is a delayed diagnosis medical negligence?

An estimated 140,000 cases of diagnostic errors happen in Australia every year. The reality is that medicine is a complex field and people who work in healthcare are still humans that can make mistakes. If you’ve walked out of a doctor’s appointment feeling like your symptoms were dismissed or a test wasn’t ordered on time, it makes sense to ask yourself whether you’re experiencing poor treatment or even medical negligence.  Delayed diagnosis happens when your medical condition is identified much later than it should have been based on a reasonable standard of care. This delay can cause your condition to worsen which can make treatment much more difficult.  The law doesn't say a...

Med negligence blog woman sitting in appointment
Justice for survivors of institutional child abuse in New South Wales

A recent High Court ruling, together with changes to legislation in New South Wales, has fundamentally changed the legal landscape for survivors of institutional child abuse. Victim-survivors who were abused in institutions now have clearer, stronger pathways to seek justice and compensation. Institutions are now much more likely to be held liable for abuse perpetrated by people acting in positions of authority and care. The Court clarified that when an institution places a child in someone’s care, it has a legal responsibility to ensure reasonable care is taken. This means that institutions can no longer hide behind arguments that the abuse was purely the criminal act of an individual. ...

Image high court of australia
Justice for survivors of institutional child abuse

A recent High Court ruling, together with changes to legislation in Victoria and the ACT, has fundamentally changed the legal landscape for survivors of institutional child abuse. Victim-survivors who were abused in institutions now have clearer, stronger pathways to seek justice and compensation. In the past, victim-survivors were unable to pursue compensation for child abuse if the abuser was not technically a formal employee. This left a loophole where institutions could escape accountability for the actions of people they placed in positions of trust and power. “Vicarious liability” is when a person or organisation is held legally responsible for the wrongful or criminal acts of...

Image high court of australia

We're here to help

Start your online claim check now. Or, if you have a question, get in touch with our team.