You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox

We are continuing to serve clients during the COVID-19 pandemic More Info.


An inquiry into the conduct of CommInsure and 12 months of public scrutiny has resulted in the life insurer back peddling on its trauma policy definitions for ‘Heart Attack’ and ‘Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis’.

CommInsure has been under fire since news broke 12 months ago that the life insurer was using out-of-date trauma definitions to deny legitimate claims.

Denied claims could be eligible for reassessment

The life insurance arm of the Commonwealth has announced that it will align its trauma definitions for ‘Heart Attack’ and ‘Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis’ with prevailing medical practice. This will also bring them in line with industry change in the form of Standardised Medical Definitions, which the Financial Services Counsel anticipates will be applicable to all trauma policies commencing 1 July 2017.

For those that have had their claims denied under the former trauma definitions, there is a glimmer of hope as CommInsure declared it would backdate its definition of ‘Heart Attack’ to claims from October 2012.

“This is a very small step in the right direction. It opens the door for consumers who have had their trauma claims rejected based on out-dated Heart Attack definitions to have their claims reassessed and paid.”

Rejected Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis claims can now be reassessed

Consumers with rejected trauma claims for “Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis’ can also have their claims reassessed, but to a not so generous time period of 2014.

While many will remain sceptical about the likely outcome of many rejected claims, the fact that the insurer has already paid out in excess of $1.37 million on reviewed claims leaves some room for optimism.

“We would urge anyone who has previously had a Trauma claim rejected by CommInsure or any other life insurer for either of these two definitions to urgently seek legal advice.”

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

Thank you for your feedback.

Related blog posts

Superannuation and Insurance
Accessing your super early may cause you to lose insurance benefits

With so many people doing it tough following the bushfires, there has been some debate around whether people who’ve lost their homes should be able to access their superannuation early. It is hard to see the point of holding onto thousands in savings in your superannuation fund, if you can’t feed your children, provide accommodation or send them back to school with the books, stationery, uniforms and other resources they will need. It’s worth understanding the consequences of draining your super account to invest in something as significant as rebuilding your life now. Doing this could cause you to lose all insurance benefits available to you via your super membership. This is the...

Superannuation savings insurance
Consumer and the Law
Banking Royal Commission legislation introduced

On 28 November 2019, the Government introduced legislation in line with the recommendations of the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry. The legislation is designed to provide further protections for consumers and small businesses and is set to be passed in early 2020. Below is an overview of the proposed legislation. Click here for a recap of the Banking Royal Commission from our Head of Class Actions, Ben Hardwick. Under the proposed legislation, mortgage brokers will be required to act in the best interests of consumers when providing credit assistance. That means where there is a conflict of interest between the consumer’s...

Gavel and weights two people talking resized
Superannuation and Insurance
An end to for-profit Super funds?

A lot has been said and written about the Productivity Commission’s ground-breaking report into the efficiency and competitiveness (or lack thereof) of the superannuation industry since it was publically released a few weeks ago. Surprisingly however, one of the Commission’s 31 recommendations appears to have attracted no attention, despite the significant implications it would have for one prominent part of the industry: retail (or for-profit) super funds. The Commission recommended that all fees charged by APRA-regulated superannuation funds should be levied on a cost-recovery basis. The Commission reasoned that because super funds are legally obliged to act in members’ best...

Piggybank

We're here to help

Start your online claim check now. Or, if you have a question, get in touch with our team.