You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox

Trees

Victoria is commonly known as the Garden State and it’s easy to see why. There’s no shortage of magnificent public and private gardens and tree lined streets in our state.

But poor maintenance combined with bad weather can result in trees and branches falling, causing property damage, serious injury and even fatalities.

Local councils and State Government have a duty to ensure trees that are on public land, including along footpaths and in parks, are safe.

Residents who are concerned about the safety of trees on public land should report their concerns to the responsible council or the relevant State Government department depending on who manages the land. The council or State Government department should arrange for an arborist to inspect the tree and carry out any maintenance work that is needed to make the tree safe.

If they fail to act, councils or the state government could face legal action if someone is hurt or dies, or the tree falls and damages a resident’s house, car or other property.

Private property owners are responsible for trees located on their property

If you believe that a tree on your property is unsafe or have received a complaint about the safety of a tree, you should arrange to have an arborist assess the tree’s health. If the tree is found to be diseased or unstable, you should have it lopped or removed. If you don’t, you could be liable for any injuries to neighbours, visitors or others.

You could also be liable for damage to your neighbour’s property, including their house, vehicles or pool. Your neighbour will be able to make an insurance claim, but if you are found liable their insurance company may be able to recoup their losses from your insurance company.

It’s important to ensure that arborists who come on to your property are properly qualified and have public liability insurance. If they don’t have insurance and are injured while working on your property, or someone else is hurt as a result of their work, you the property owner could be liable.

If a tree in good condition falls or drops limbs as a result of bad weather it will likely be considered an act of god.

A property owner’s home insurance should cover any property damage that results from a tree falling or dropping limbs in such circumstances.

If you’ve been injured because someone else didn’t take the right amount of care, you may be able to make a public liability claim.

Find out if you have a claim in just 3 minutes

Use our free Online Claim Check to find out where you stand and if you have a claim.

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

Related blog posts

Is a delayed diagnosis medical negligence?

An estimated 140,000 cases of diagnostic errors happen in Australia every year. The reality is that medicine is a complex field and people who work in healthcare are still humans that can make mistakes. If you’ve walked out of a doctor’s appointment feeling like your symptoms were dismissed or a test wasn’t ordered on time, it makes sense to ask yourself whether you’re experiencing poor treatment or even medical negligence.  Delayed diagnosis happens when your medical condition is identified much later than it should have been based on a reasonable standard of care. This delay can cause your condition to worsen which can make treatment much more difficult.  The law doesn't say a...

Med negligence blog woman sitting in appointment
Justice for survivors of institutional child abuse in New South Wales

A recent High Court ruling, together with changes to legislation in New South Wales, has fundamentally changed the legal landscape for survivors of institutional child abuse. Victim-survivors who were abused in institutions now have clearer, stronger pathways to seek justice and compensation. Institutions are now much more likely to be held liable for abuse perpetrated by people acting in positions of authority and care. The Court clarified that when an institution places a child in someone’s care, it has a legal responsibility to ensure reasonable care is taken. This means that institutions can no longer hide behind arguments that the abuse was purely the criminal act of an individual. ...

Image high court of australia
Justice for survivors of institutional child abuse

A recent High Court ruling, together with changes to legislation in Victoria and the ACT, has fundamentally changed the legal landscape for survivors of institutional child abuse. Victim-survivors who were abused in institutions now have clearer, stronger pathways to seek justice and compensation. In the past, victim-survivors were unable to pursue compensation for child abuse if the abuser was not technically a formal employee. This left a loophole where institutions could escape accountability for the actions of people they placed in positions of trust and power. “Vicarious liability” is when a person or organisation is held legally responsible for the wrongful or criminal acts of...

Image high court of australia

We're here to help

Start your online claim check now. Or, if you have a question, get in touch with our team.