You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox

We are continuing to serve clients during the COVID-19 pandemic More Info.

I will readily admit that I’ve had my moments where, as a motorist, I’m incredulous and frustrated when a cyclist does something that appears horribly dangerous to both themselves and to other road users.

Having recently attended the Australasian Road Safety Conference on the Gold Coast, one of the many topics discussed was how do we improve conditions and the relationship between cyclists and motorists on the road.

Chairman of the Amy Gillett Foundation, Mark Textor, spoke of the importance of motorists and cyclists working together. Almost every driver can tell you a story about a cyclist flaunting the road rules – just like every cyclist can name a time their safety was put at jeopardy by an inattentive or aggressive driver. Having spent some time on a bike I’ve come across this myself.

I found it very refreshing to hear that the Foundation was more than happy to recognise that there are dangerous cyclists on the road just as there are dangerous drivers. What they did reiterate though was that this mentality of ‘us v them’ is counter-productive, and both cyclists and motorists need to take a more selfless approach in getting to their destinations.

One thing all of us can do right now is to become familiar with the road rules that apply in our respective state:

  • In NSW, Victoria and WA it is only legal to ride on a footpath if you are under the age of 12 or supervising someone under the age of 12. In Queensland, ACT, SA, Tasmania and the Northern Territory it’s legal to ride on a footpath but at the same time it is up to the cyclist to give way to pedestrians and be safe.
  • It is legal across Australia for cyclists to ride side by side – however, it may be necessary to pull into single file to let other road users past – common sense is key.
  • Cyclists are bound by the same road rules as motorists (i.e. they can be booked for running red lights, performing illegal U-turns and even speeding).
  • In Queensland, the ACT and South Australia motorists must give room to cyclists of 1 metre if travelling 60km/hr or less and 1.5 metres if travelling more than 60km/hr. This particular rule is currently being considered by other states.

The rule that is potentially going to cause the most dispute, in my opinion, is the latter passing rule. The problem here is going to be the ability to enforce a breach of the rule as it could be subjective and ‘one word against another’. Technology will certainly help but there will always be a person who believes they are in the right when perhaps they’re in the wrong.

The real solution, and the whole point of having the passing rule, is to create awareness for both motorists and cyclists. The onus is on both parties to be aware of their surroundings and facilitate rather than frustrate. If a motorist comes across a cyclist on a narrow road then they may have to slow down and concentrate to ensure they are adhering to the passing rule. At the same time, a cyclist may have to stop riding side by side on the same narrow road and move as far to the left as possible to make sure the motorist can pass safely.

The whole point is that cyclists need to cooperate with motorists and motorists need to cooperate with cyclists. Getting caught up in a battle of who has the right to use the road and in what way is a pointless exercise so the solution is to increase awareness and have both ‘sides’ work together to share the road responsibly and safely.

For bike-related laws and road rules by state and territory take a look at this page on the Bicycle Network Australia website.

You can also keep up-to-date with the AGF's 'A Metre Matters' campaign, including any updates to this law around Australia here.

Find out where you stand for free in 2 – 3 minutes

If you or a family member have been injured in any kind of road accident, you might be entitled to a range of compensation benefits. Answer a few simple questions to find out where you stand and, if eligible, book a free appointment with one of our caring and experienced lawyers.

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

Thank you for your feedback.

Related blog posts

Compensation Law
Can you still claim workers compensation if you’ve been injured whilst working from home?

COVID-19 has created what has been described as the largest working-from-home experiment the world has ever seen. The current pandemic has caused a fundamental change in the way many of us work and the location we are now working from. One of the interesting issues which arises from this shift is the question of what compensation entitlements a person might have if they suffer an injury whilst working at home. Every state and territory’s rules differ, but workers’ compensation generally applies to workers who suffer physical or psychological injuries whilst doing their job. The location of work is not usually important, so as a starting point, injuries which occur whilst you’re...

Working from home
Compensation Law
Revisiting unfair decisions for abuse survivors

It’s been one year since the doors were opened for child abuse survivors to have a second chance at receiving the financial support and justice they deserve. The Children Legislation Amendment Act 2019 was announced on 14 June, allowing courts to set aside unjust judgements or settlements. The Catholic Church’s Melbourne Response and Towards Healing schemes imposed caps on compensation in years gone by, often giving abuse survivors no choice but to accept totally inadequate settlements considering the horrors experienced in their childhoods. Settlements often required the survivor to sign a deed of release and confidentiality clause preventing them from speaking out or taking further...

Child in hallway
Compensation Law
New review option for unreasonable WorkCover insurer decisions

Injured workers now have the option for WorkSafe to review questionable insurer decisions before taking their dispute to court if it has not been overturned at Conciliation. WorkSafe Victoria has launched the Workers Compensation Independent Review Service, to provide another avenue for injured workers to have their workers’ compensation claim decisions reviewed by WorkSafe. Reviews will be carried out by a new team at WorkSafe, separate from the insurers. They will instruct the insurer to change the decision if it isn’t found to be sustainable. The new service was created in response to the Victorian Ombudsman’s report released last year, following multiple investigations into the...

Man reviewing form

We're here to help

Start your online claim check now. Or, if you have a question, get in touch with our team.