You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox


A young carpenter and union client of Slater and Gordon’s Melbourne Motor Vehicle Accidents team last week settled his claim against the TAC for a six-figure sum, after sustaining significant injuries in a transport accident in 2012.

Reece, 29, was involved in an accident when his motorbike was struck by another vehicle that failed to give way to him while executing a U-turn. Reece sustained a number of very serious injuries in the accident, including a head injury, punctured lungs, multiple spinal fractures and a badly fractured right wrist. He required a spinal fusion and has had multiple surgeries to his right wrist, with doctors anticipating he will require more surgery in future.

At the time of the accident Reece was working as a carpenter for a high-rise construction company doing façade installation. His work involved a lot of heavy manual labour including hauling glass panes that weighed between 80 to 200 kg. Following the accident, Reece was unable to go back to his former job due to his injuries and, in fact, doctors doubted that Reece would ever get back to any sort of manual carpentry work at all. However, to Reece’s immense credit, he did not let his injuries hold him back. Determined to get back to work, he joined forces with a friend of his from high school and now runs a successful business, Custom Edge Constructions, doing domestic carpentry work.

As a member of one of Slater and Gordon’s affiliated unions, Reece was referred to Victorian State Practice Group Leader Joanne Panagakis for assistance with his TAC claim. The issue in Reece’s case was getting the TAC to accept the fact that, as a result of his injuries, Reece would not be able to return to the lucrative high-rise construction work he had previously done. Using evidence from Reece’s former employer, his business partner and his former colleagues, we were able to establish that Reece had suffered, and would continue to suffer, a significant financial loss as a result of his accident injuries despite his return to work.

This was a fantastic result for Reece and the settlement money will go a long way towards providing financial security for him and his wife into the future.

If you have been involved in a transport accident and want to know your rights, contact Slater and Gordon on 1800 555 777.

Find out where you stand for free in 2 – 3 minutes

If you or a family member have been injured in any kind of road accident, you might be entitled to a range of compensation benefits. Answer a few simple questions to find out where you stand and, if eligible, book a free appointment with one of our caring and experienced lawyers.

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

Related blog posts

Is a delayed diagnosis medical negligence?

An estimated 140,000 cases of diagnostic errors happen in Australia every year. The reality is that medicine is a complex field and people who work in healthcare are still humans that can make mistakes. If you’ve walked out of a doctor’s appointment feeling like your symptoms were dismissed or a test wasn’t ordered on time, it makes sense to ask yourself whether you’re experiencing poor treatment or even medical negligence.  Delayed diagnosis happens when your medical condition is identified much later than it should have been based on a reasonable standard of care. This delay can cause your condition to worsen which can make treatment much more difficult.  The law doesn't say a...

Med negligence blog woman sitting in appointment
Justice for survivors of institutional child abuse in New South Wales

A recent High Court ruling, together with changes to legislation in New South Wales, has fundamentally changed the legal landscape for survivors of institutional child abuse. Victim-survivors who were abused in institutions now have clearer, stronger pathways to seek justice and compensation. Institutions are now much more likely to be held liable for abuse perpetrated by people acting in positions of authority and care. The Court clarified that when an institution places a child in someone’s care, it has a legal responsibility to ensure reasonable care is taken. This means that institutions can no longer hide behind arguments that the abuse was purely the criminal act of an individual. ...

Image high court of australia
Justice for survivors of institutional child abuse

A recent High Court ruling, together with changes to legislation in Victoria and the ACT, has fundamentally changed the legal landscape for survivors of institutional child abuse. Victim-survivors who were abused in institutions now have clearer, stronger pathways to seek justice and compensation. In the past, victim-survivors were unable to pursue compensation for child abuse if the abuser was not technically a formal employee. This left a loophole where institutions could escape accountability for the actions of people they placed in positions of trust and power. “Vicarious liability” is when a person or organisation is held legally responsible for the wrongful or criminal acts of...

Image high court of australia

We're here to help

Start your online claim check now. Or, if you have a question, get in touch with our team.