You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox

We are continuing to serve clients during the COVID-19 pandemic More Info.


When the actions of a company or industry cause problems in the local environment, it can also have a negative impact on the health of local residents or workers nearby.

If you have health complaints and have suffered loss because of environmental polluters, you may be entitled to compensation.

Potential health issues may arise from:

  • farm spraying;
  • water contamination;
  • industry, factory or mining pollution; or
  • waste disposal sites.

It’s important here to make a distinction between contracting an illness at work or at home. In the case of workers, if the cause of an illness can be attributed to the workplace you have access to workers compensation rights, or, you can take legal action against the employer.

For local residents the situation is different and much more complex.

Residents must look at their health complaint and establish if there’s a clear relationship between the symptoms and the factors which they believe are causing the problem (e.g. contaminated water or air pollution).

To take legal action, residents would have to identify which company is the manufacturer of the pollutant and prove that it contained carcinogens or some other toxic elements which caused their health problems. This process may involve:

  • seeking out a health professional’s opinion;
  • gaining relevant medical evidence and/or;
  • asking authorities to investigate the issue.

If you go through this process and establish there's a known relationship between your health problem and the pollutants, you may have a legal case to pursue.

While we may see many cases in the USA where people take action against polluting corporations, in Australia the laws are not as well developed. Litigation can be tough and is often heavily defended. Polluters argue that there are other factors involved, such as an individual’s lifestyle choices – cigarette smoking for example – or exposure to other pollutants elsewhere.

If you feel as if you've been impacted by a polluter, get in touch and we can talk your situation through.

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

Thank you for your feedback.

Related blog posts

Compensation Law
Revisiting unfair decisions for abuse survivors

It’s been one year since the doors were opened for child abuse survivors to have a second chance at receiving the financial support and justice they deserve. The Children Legislation Amendment Act 2019 was announced on 14 June, allowing courts to set aside unjust judgements or settlements. The Catholic Church’s Melbourne Response and Towards Healing schemes imposed caps on compensation in years gone by, often giving abuse survivors no choice but to accept totally inadequate settlements considering the horrors experienced in their childhoods. Settlements often required the survivor to sign a deed of release and confidentiality clause preventing them from speaking out or taking further...

Child in hallway
Compensation Law
New review option for unreasonable WorkCover insurer decisions

Injured workers now have the option for WorkSafe to review questionable insurer decisions before taking their dispute to court if it has not been overturned at Conciliation. WorkSafe Victoria has launched the Workers Compensation Independent Review Service, to provide another avenue for injured workers to have their workers’ compensation claim decisions reviewed by WorkSafe. Reviews will be carried out by a new team at WorkSafe, separate from the insurers. They will instruct the insurer to change the decision if it isn’t found to be sustainable. The new service was created in response to the Victorian Ombudsman’s report released last year, following multiple investigations into the...

Man reviewing form
Compensation Law
30 years of the NSW Dust Diseases Tribunal

On 1 November 1989 Judge John O’Meally sat for the first time in the New South Wales Dust Diseases Tribunal (the “Tribunal”) when it heard its first case. This month, during Asbestos Awareness Month the Tribunal celebrated 30 years of operation. The Tribunal was created by the NSW Parliament after years of long delays in the Supreme Court and District Court which often saw plaintiffs suffering from dust diseases die before their cases could be heard. During the Second Reading Speech on 3 May 1989, Mr Dowd, the then NSW Attorney General said: Honourable members will be aware of the considerable delays that exist in the common law jurisdictions of both the Supreme Court and the...

Asbestos danger sign

We're here to help

Start your online claim check now. Or, if you have a question, get in touch with our team.