Posted on 20 Sep. 2016
Leading law firm Slater and Gordon will prepare a class action on behalf of a group of aggrieved investors who acquired shares in building services company Hastie Group Limited in the months prior to the company being placed into voluntary administration.
Providing there is sufficient investor interest, the planned class action will be funded by listed litigation funder IMF Bentham Limited and will be against Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu and Deloitte Corporate Finance Pty Limited, a financial advisory group.
Slater and Gordon Principal Lawyer Tim Finney said the action would allege that the Deloitte entities engaged in misleading conduct, in contravention of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) by providing assurances about the reliability and accuracy of financial statements and earnings forecasts available to investors in a June 2011 Hastie prospectus.
"The proposed class action will allege that the Deloitte entities made misstatements in the prospectus document and that, as a result, investors who purchased Hastie shares may have suffered a compensable loss," Mr Finney said.
Hundreds of aggrieved shareholders (including 'mum and dad' and institutional investors) have contacted Slater and Gordon following Hastie’s collapse in May 2012.
"Based on our investigations, it is our opinion that there are reasonable grounds to allege that the Deloitte entities engaged in misleading conduct and, as a result, investors who bought Hastie shares following the release of the prospectus may be entitled to recover any losses suffered."
All current and former shareholders who acquired shares in Hastie, on or after 14 June 2011, are invited to register their interest in the proposed class action. Investors who wish to participate in the proposed class action can obtain an information pack by visiting the website of IMF Bentham Limited here.
Background to the Hastie Group class action
On 17 June 2011, Hastie Group Limited lodged a prospectus with the ASX for a $160 million capital-raising by way of institutional placements and a renounceable entitlement offer.
In the following months, the company announced a series of asset impairments, substantially downgraded its full year earnings guidance and announced an anticipated earnings loss of $146 million for the first half of the 2011/12 financial year.
In May 2012, Hastie declared that it had discovered ‘accounting irregularities’ in its services business, resulting in the resignation of two non-executive directors and the company being placed into voluntary administration shortly thereafter.
PPB were appointed as administrators.