We’ve noticed that you’re using an unsupported browser,
which may result in pages displaying incorrectly.

For a better viewing experience, we recommend upgrading to the latest browser version of:

Skip to main content
Call Call 1800 555 777
1800 555 777
or let us call you

Let Us Call You


Billabong Shareholder Class Action


On 11 July 2016, the parties settled the class action for $45 million.

On 7 October 2016, the Federal Court of Australia made orders approving the settlement of the class action and appointing Slater and Gordon as Administrators of the Settlement Distribution Scheme.

Registered Group Members will be contacted by Slater and Gordon by Friday 14 October 2016 with further information in relation to the distribution of the settlement funds.


The allegations in the class action relate to an announcement by Billabong to the market on 19 August 2011 that, contrary to prior earnings guidance given on 18 February 2011, it no longer expected to return to Earnings Per Share (EPS) growth rates in excess of 10 per cent per annum in the second half of the 2011 financial year (2H11) and the financial year ending 30 June 2012 (FY12); and an announcement on 19 December 2011 that, contrary to prior earnings guidance, it no longer expected strong underlying growth in earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) for FY12 but, rather, expected its EBITDA performance for the first half of FY12 (1H12) to be 20-26% below its 1H11 performance.

In response to the announcement on 19 August 2011, Billabong’s share price fell from $5.15 immediately prior to the disclosure to $3.46 on 22 August, a fall of about 33 per cent. In response to the announcement on 19 December 2011, Billabong’s share price fell from $3.64 immediately prior to the disclosure to $1.77 on 20 December 2011, a fall of about 51 per cent.

The class action alleged that during the period of 18 February 2011 to immediately prior to the publication of a trading update on 19 December 2011, Billabong engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct and failed to abide by its continuous disclosure obligations and the ASX Listing Rules, by providing guidance for FY11 and FY12 without a reasonable basis and by failing to inform the market about information which had a material impact on the value of Billabong securities.