You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox

Can a discretionary bonus be paid after a worker ceases employment?

Many professionals have a base salary upon which they can build through a bonus structure or scheme of some sort. Bonuses are intended to boost, enhance and reward motivation, performance and loyalty.

We are frequently told that employees are aggrieved when their employers refuse to pay a bonus which they would have received if they had not resigned or had continued in employment. We are then asked whether payment can be enforced legally.

The law in the area can be grey, and the application of the law can also be difficult, especially when such bonuses are expressed to be discretionary.

English law

The law in England is that where an employment contract provides for payment of a bonus, but payment is discretionary; there is an implied term that the discretion will not be exercised “capriciously, arbitrarily, irrationally or perversely”. The employer’s discretion, therefore, is not absolute.

Australian law

The law is less developed in Australia but decisions in some jurisdictions have adopted the English approach.

For example, the Victorian Supreme Court considered the exercise of an employer’s discretion with regard to bonus payments in Eshuys v St Barbara Ltd . In this case, the plaintiff was the company’s Managing Director. His contract included a final performance payment up to $1,000,000 to be decided by the board in its discretion, based on the “extent of compliance” with the stated performance criteria.

The parties to the case agreed that the English principles applied; that is, an employer is not to act “capriciously, arbitrarily, irrationally or perversely”, or, not to reach a decision which “no reasonable board” could make. The Court added that these principles should be applied with an understanding of the particular commercial context in which the contract was entered into and the decision was made.

The plaintiff failed to show the board acted irrationally or perversely in exercising the discretion and the plaintiff failed. The lesson here is that the payment of a bonus is dependent both on the precise nature of the contract and the commercial context facing the employer.

Often the purpose or intent of a bonus clause in a contract is that it is to be both an incentive for high performance and a reward for loyalty. It will therefore often be legitimate for an employer to refuse to pay a bonus because the employee has resigned from the employment even if the employee would otherwise qualify.

There are, however, instances in which a bonus may be paid after cessation of work. If a bonus is based on the meeting of clear, set targets which measure individual performance, for example, an employer cannot choose unreasonably or indiscriminately not to pay the bonus if the targets are satisfied.

The possibility of a bonus being paid after cessation of employment depends largely on the contractual wording of the bonus and the commerciality of the payment.

Rulings in favour of both employer and employee are possible.

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

Thank you for your feedback.

Related blog posts

Workplace Law
Pay your staff properly

Pay your staff properly: it’s not rocket science. That’s my message to the chefs and restaurateurs who last week begged for an amnesty for wage theft. They make some interesting claims: “there’s too many awards”; “most people are trying to do the right thing”; “I had to work for free when I first started”; “why is everyone picking on the hospitality industry?” or “customers need to pay more”. The underlying themes are that the restaurateurs don’t understand the rules and that they were exploited themselves as juniors, therefore it’s fair enough. Oh, and let’s not forget the big one: it’s too expensive and I don’t want to. None of these excuses are good...

Cooks in kitchen blurred motion RESIZED
Workplace Law
Small business employees would lose out under Fair Dismissal Code changes

The Small Business and Family Enterprise Ombudsman’s proposal to change the Small Business Fair Dismissal Code is not likely to result in fairer outcomes for employees or fewer claims for small business owners to deal with. The changes may make it easier for small businesses to get rid of employees quickly, meaning the system would be heavily weighted against workers. That’s why we are calling on Attorney General and Minister for Industrial Relations Christian Porter to consider the employees first, who already have little protection or job security when employed with a small business, when reviewing the industrial relations process. The Ombudsman's review recommends separate processes...

Barista Cleaning Machine
Workplace Law
Australians struggling with pressure to stay connected after hours

In a digital world; portable laptops, tablets and smartphones mean an employee can work from almost anywhere at anytime. More employers are expecting their employees to remain constantly connected to work outside of normal hours – putting the mental health of staff at risk. Employees can feel guilty for switching off their devices linked to work emails, worried that an issue may come up that needs their immediate attention. This has had the effect of shattering the traditional working hours that helped separate home and family life. Even if the employee is not sitting at a computer, a notification on a smartphone alerting them to a new work email takes them back into 'office mode' –...

We're here to help. Make an enquiry now.

If you have a question, want some more information or would just like to speak to someone, make an enquiry now to arrange a consultation for just $660 (including GST). Our Employment Law team will be in touch with you as soon as possible.

Call us on 1800 444 141