You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox

Right across Australia there are a number of ‘non-cost’ legal jurisdictions which enable people to take legal action without the risk of having to pay the costs of the other parties if they lose.

But in recent times, the benches of these non-cost commissions and courts – such as administrative review tribunals and industrial tribunals – are more frequently exercising their narrow powers to award costs in cases where it appears someone is set on a course of litigating to harass or annoy.

One recent case is the marathon dispute between Robert DeCastella’s charitable organisation SmartStart for Kids Ltd and a disgruntled volunteer who worked for the organisation. The ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal – generally a non-costs jurisdiction – dismissed Mr Bell’s claims of discrimination and in a decision delivered on 27 September 2013 actually awarded costs against Mr Bell.

Mr Bell was involved as a volunteer in the development and delivery of an Indigenous Marathon Project. He was not paid for his time, but under a contract with the Association was entitled to reimbursement of mobile phone, travel and other expenses.

After his services to the organisation were terminated, he commenced eight separate legal actions against Robert DeCastella and SmartStart for Kids, claiming for unfair dismissal, alleged entitlements from an alleged employment contract, unlawful political conviction and professional discrimination, alleged victimisation, and a claim in the ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal for race discrimination. He alleged that he was discriminated against as he was non indigenous.

The ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal described the motivation for Mr Bell’s actions as being likely designed to harass Mr DeCastella rather than by a genuine belief that he had been discriminated against. It found his claims to be unreasonable, without foundation and vexatious.

Accordingly, the ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal ordered him to pay certain costs to the respondents resulting from his unreasonable conduct of the claim.

Although Robert DeCastella and SmartStart for Kids will not recover all of their costs of the proceedings – not to mention their time and other resources defending the claims – the decision makes it clear that applicants should not utilise non-costs jurisdictions to bring frivolous or unmeritorious claims. Those who do, run a real risk of financial detriment.

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

Thank you for your feedback.

Related blog posts

How is your claim being progressed during COVID-19?

COVID-19 has had an unprecedented effect on how we do many things. It has changed how many of us work, socialise and interact with one another. You might be wondering how has the pandemic affected the legal industry? And how is your compensation claim being progressed during this time? You’ll be pleased to know that Slater and Gordon and the wider legal community are working hard to try to minimise the impact to your claim. This article lists some of the ways we’re continuing to move your claim forward during lockdown in Victoria. This will depend on where your matter is being heard. The Victorian County and Supreme Courts converted to remote hearings and adapted to digital processes...

Woman video conferencing
Slater and Gordon welcome Labor’s Wage Theft Tribunal

In September the Federal Circuit Court fined the director of a cleaning business for underpaying three vulnerable South Korean migrant workers by $10,000. If the director had stolen $10,000, he would have faced years in prison. Because it's ‘only wage theft’, he got a fine. For the cleaners missing out, it doesn’t feel that different. Wage theft is rampant in Australia. UNSW has identified over $1 billion in stolen wages across our economy. Yet the Fair Work Ombudsman’s annual report suggests that last year it handed out only $7.2 million in in penalties. For many businesses, they do the maths and decide it’s a risk they are willing to take. That’s why Labor’s announcement...

Federal Court Australia   Blog Upload
What is the role of a legal assistant?

Have you ever called your lawyers office, only to be greeted by their legal assistant? Whilst at times considered a gate-keeper to the lawyer, the role of a legal assistant is a critical part of your case, working closely with your lawyer to deliver you the best outcome possible. In this article we provide an overview of the role of a legal assistant and what you can expect them to be doing as part of the expert legal team working on your case. In many circumstances, the legal assistant may be the first person from your legal team that you interact with after booking an appointment. Depending on how quickly your appointment occurs, they will likely give you a call to confirm your...

Two People At Desk Reseized Blog

We're here to help

Start your online claim check now. Or, if you have a question, get in touch with our team.