You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox

Bullock Order

In many areas of litigation, particularly in the superior state and federal courts, the unsuccessful party (the loser) in a case is ordered to pay the legal costs of the successful party (the winner). However in cases where there are more than two parties involved, it is not necessarily as clear cut as loser pays winner.

Take the following scenario:

Joe engages an architect, surveyor and builder to design and construct his new-build cliff top home. Half way through the construction phase, after weeks of heavy rain, a massive land slide on site sees Joe’s half built house tumble into the sea below. Joe decides to sue all involved. The builder issues a cross claim against the architect, alleging he designed a faulty building. The architect, who it transpires out-sourced most of the design work to a third party, issues a cross claim against that party. The surveyor issues a cross claim against both the builder and architect, seeking a contribution from either of them in the event he loses against Joe.

Following many days of hard fought litigation, the judge determines that: Joe’s claim against the builder and surveyor succeeds, however he fails against the architect. The builder’s cross claim against the architect fails. The architect’s cross claim against the third party also fails. The surveyor’s cross claim against the architect succeeds, however he loses against the builder.

Clearly, there have been a number of wins, and losses, by all involved. In this intricate web, who should pay Joe’s legal costs? Should Joe have to pay the architect’s costs, since he lost that part of his case? And what of the costs of the various cross claims?

In these situations, the Court can make a Bullock Order.

A Bullock Order can require an unsuccessful defendant to pay costs that include the plaintiff’s liability to pay the costs of a successful defendant. In our scenario, Joe might be ordered to pay the architect’s costs (since he lost that part of his case), which amount to $50. Under a Bullock Order, the builder or surveyor could be ordered to pay to Joe, not only Joe’s costs of the case (which are $100), but also the amount that Joe has to pay to the architect ($50). So, the builder or surveyor will have to pay $150 in costs to Joe.

As for the cross claims, because the surveyor won against the architect but lost against the builder, the surveyor is ordered to pay the builders costs of the cross claim. A Bullock Order is made, requiring the architect to pay the surveyor’s costs of the cross claim, plus the amount the surveyor has to pay the builder.

The name comes from the English decision of Bullock v London General Omnibus Co [1904-7] All ER Rep 44; [1907] 1 KB 264.

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

Thank you for your feedback.

Related blog posts

How is your claim being progressed during COVID-19?

COVID-19 has had an unprecedented effect on how we do many things. It has changed how many of us work, socialise and interact with one another. You might be wondering how has the pandemic affected the legal industry? And how is your compensation claim being progressed during this time? You’ll be pleased to know that Slater and Gordon and the wider legal community are working hard to try to minimise the impact to your claim. This article lists some of the ways we’re continuing to move your claim forward during lockdown in Victoria. This will depend on where your matter is being heard. The Victorian County and Supreme Courts converted to remote hearings and adapted to digital processes...

Woman video conferencing
Slater and Gordon welcome Labor’s Wage Theft Tribunal

In September the Federal Circuit Court fined the director of a cleaning business for underpaying three vulnerable South Korean migrant workers by $10,000. If the director had stolen $10,000, he would have faced years in prison. Because it's ‘only wage theft’, he got a fine. For the cleaners missing out, it doesn’t feel that different. Wage theft is rampant in Australia. UNSW has identified over $1 billion in stolen wages across our economy. Yet the Fair Work Ombudsman’s annual report suggests that last year it handed out only $7.2 million in in penalties. For many businesses, they do the maths and decide it’s a risk they are willing to take. That’s why Labor’s announcement...

Federal Court Australia   Blog Upload
What is the role of a legal assistant?

Have you ever called your lawyers office, only to be greeted by their legal assistant? Whilst at times considered a gate-keeper to the lawyer, the role of a legal assistant is a critical part of your case, working closely with your lawyer to deliver you the best outcome possible. In this article we provide an overview of the role of a legal assistant and what you can expect them to be doing as part of the expert legal team working on your case. In many circumstances, the legal assistant may be the first person from your legal team that you interact with after booking an appointment. Depending on how quickly your appointment occurs, they will likely give you a call to confirm your...

Two People At Desk Reseized Blog

We're here to help

Start your online claim check now. Or, if you have a question, get in touch with our team.