You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox

Elder financial abuse occurs when a relationship of trust is manipulated to the financial detriment of an older person. While you may have heard it used in a family context, older people are also vulnerable in dealings with advisors or professionals.

The World Health Organisation defines financial abuse of an older person as being the “illegal or improper exploitation or use of funds or other resources of the older person”. The WHO definition captures abusive behaviour of friends and family members but also extends in some instances to that of professional advisors and institutions. Professional advisors, including solicitors, financial planners, insurance brokers and the like, may operate in a manner that amounts to professional negligence or in ways that takes advantage of their vulnerable older client.

Elder financial abuse and professional negligence in practice

From our experience we’ve seen older clients suffer financial loss through:

  • Negligent advice from a solicitor on property transactions or asset management;
  • Financial advisors recommending investments that are not appropriate in the circumstances;
  • Financial institutions approving loans which are unnecessary or unaffordable – particularly where an older person may be asset rich but cash poor;
  • Financial institutions acting on the instructions of a person who claims to be a validly appointed attorney without having regard to the existence or terms of any agreement appointing that person;
  • A solicitor carrying out unnecessary work or overcharging;
  • A solicitor acting on instructions of a friend or family member supposedly on behalf of an older person but where the effect of those instructions are to their detriment

In a recent case we represented an older client who was legally blind. Our client had appointed two friends as joint attorneys. One of these appointed custodians then proceeded to make substantial cash withdrawals from the client’s bank account. The effect of the joint appointment required both attorneys to sign all documents concerning dealings made on behalf of our elderly client. The bank neglected to obtain a certified copy of the power of attorney document. Had it done so, it would have realised it required both appointed attorneys to sign the withdrawal forms. In this particular circumstance, an out-of-court settlement was reached with the bank.

For more information or to find out how we can help visit the Elder Financial Abuse section on our website.

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

Thank you for your feedback.

Related blog posts

Consumer and the Law
Banking Royal Commission legislation introduced

On 28 November 2019, the Government introduced legislation in line with the recommendations of the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry. The legislation is designed to provide further protections for consumers and small businesses and is set to be passed in early 2020. Below is an overview of the proposed legislation. Click here for a recap of the Banking Royal Commission from our Head of Class Actions, Ben Hardwick. Under the proposed legislation, mortgage brokers will be required to act in the best interests of consumers when providing credit assistance. That means where there is a conflict of interest between the consumer’s...

Gavel and weights two people talking resized
Financial Negligence
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority’s powers are being expanded for 12 months: Do you …

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) is responsible for providing consumers and small businesses with free and independent dispute resolution for financial complaints. AFCA considers complaints in relation to: These complaints were previously handled by the Financial Ombudsman Service, the Credit and Investments Ombudsman and the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal. The usual time limit for making a complaint to AFCA is 6 years from the date you became aware of the financial loss.[1] However, when a complaint has already been through the financial firm’s internal dispute resolution process, the time limit is reduced to 2 years from the date you receive response from the...

Finance Planning People Documents Resized
Financial Negligence
Online scams and the Financial Ombudsmen service

As our population ages, our vulnerable elderly people are increasingly falling victim to elder abuse perpetrated by adult children, family members, friends and carers. But older Australians are also increasingly preyed upon by fraudsters. The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) has recently published two determinations which consider whether the older person’s bank is liable for “allowing” them to transfer funds. In the first case (Case number 431342, 2 December 2016), the Applicant transferred $123,019 from his bank account to a fraudster who kept the funds. The Applicant claimed the bank should compensate him for his loss. FOS found, however, that the bank did not cause or contribute...

We're here to help

Start your online claim check now. Or, if you have a question, get in touch with our team.