You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox

If you are looking for information on Westpac CCI class action click here


Slater and Gordon is investigating compensation claims on behalf of investors who received financial advice from Commonwealth Financial Planning, Financial Wisdom and Macquarie Private Wealth following reports of serious deficiencies and misconduct in respect of the financial advice provided to customers.

In response to involvement from ASIC, both the CBA and Macquarie Bank have initiated programs for the review of the financial advice provided to customers. Both banks have offered to meet the cost of clients obtaining independent legal advice about any offers of compensation made to persons arising out of either review program.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia - Open Advice Review Program

The CBA Open Advice Review Program (OAR) is open to customers who received advice from Commonwealth Financial Planning (CFP) and Financial Wisdom (FW) between 1 September 2003 and 1 July 2012 and who are minded to have the advice they received reviewed and assessed.

On 2 November 2014, Slater and Gordon was appointed by the CBA to act as an Independent Customer Advocate as part of the OAR Program. Slater and Gordon is one of three firms that have been appointed to act in this capacity.

The cost of obtaining independent legal advice in the OAR Program will be met by the CBA.

Macquarie Client Review Program

In January 2013, Macquarie and ASIC agreed to an Enforceable Undertaking which requires Macquarie to undertake a remediation process for clients who received deficient financial advice. The Enforceable Undertaking followed an extensive ASIC investigation into Macquarie’s financial product advice business which revealed a series of serious deficiencies including:

  • client files not containing statements of advice;
  • advisers failing to demonstrate a reasonable basis for advice provided to the client; and
  • poor client records and lack of detail contained in advice documents.

On 13 August 2014, Macquarie wrote to around 160,000 its past and current customers advising customers that they can request a review of the advice received (the Client Review Process). Customers who received this letter, are eligible to have their file reviewed.

The process allows customers to be reimbursed up to $5,000 for professional advice (including legal advice) to consider the outcome of Macquarie’s review of the advice received.

How Slater and Gordon can help

Slater and Gordon has Australia’s premier financial services negligence litigation team. We regularly commence proceedings against financial advisors and stock brokers on behalf of our clients.

Slater and Gordon is providing assistance to CBA and Macquarie customers who wish to have their file reviewed by those banks. Customers may contact us to discuss participation in either review program free of charge, and on a ‘no obligation’ basis.

We strongly recommend that participants in either review program obtain independent advice about the adequacy (or otherwise) of any compensation offer received. We expect that any compensation offer will be made on the basis that any claim is settled fully and finally. It is therefore critical that participants are in a position to make an informed decision about whether to accept the amount of compensation offered and whether the offer represents ‘fair value’ for their claim.

Limitations Periods

It is timely for professional advisors to reflect on any potential claims their clients may have arising out of losses suffered during the Global Financial Crisis, which may imminently become statute barred. We recommend that clients obtain advice regarding any potential claims as soon as possible so as to ensure that preventative action can be taken to prevent the claim from expiring.

Strict time limitations apply to most legal claims. If claims are not commenced in Court before the applicable time limit expires, the right to pursue the claim will be permanently lost. For legal claims relating to a breach of contract, claims must be brought within 6 years of the breach. For negligence claims, claims must be brought within 6 years of the date on which the claimant first suffers loss as a result of the negligent advice.

Ben Hardwick and Ben Whitwell are commercial litigation lawyers.

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

Thank you for your feedback.

Related blog posts

Consumer and the Law
Banking Royal Commission legislation introduced

On 28 November 2019, the Government introduced legislation in line with the recommendations of the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry. The legislation is designed to provide further protections for consumers and small businesses and is set to be passed in early 2020. Below is an overview of the proposed legislation. Click here for a recap of the Banking Royal Commission from our Head of Class Actions, Ben Hardwick. Under the proposed legislation, mortgage brokers will be required to act in the best interests of consumers when providing credit assistance. That means where there is a conflict of interest between the consumer’s...

Gavel and weights two people talking resized
Financial Negligence
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority’s powers are being expanded for 12 months: Do you …

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) is responsible for providing consumers and small businesses with free and independent dispute resolution for financial complaints. AFCA considers complaints in relation to: These complaints were previously handled by the Financial Ombudsman Service, the Credit and Investments Ombudsman and the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal. The usual time limit for making a complaint to AFCA is 6 years from the date you became aware of the financial loss.[1] However, when a complaint has already been through the financial firm’s internal dispute resolution process, the time limit is reduced to 2 years from the date you receive response from the...

Finance Planning People Documents Resized
Financial Negligence
Online scams and the Financial Ombudsmen service

As our population ages, our vulnerable elderly people are increasingly falling victim to elder abuse perpetrated by adult children, family members, friends and carers. But older Australians are also increasingly preyed upon by fraudsters. The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) has recently published two determinations which consider whether the older person’s bank is liable for “allowing” them to transfer funds. In the first case (Case number 431342, 2 December 2016), the Applicant transferred $123,019 from his bank account to a fraudster who kept the funds. The Applicant claimed the bank should compensate him for his loss. FOS found, however, that the bank did not cause or contribute...

We're here to help

Start your online claim check now. Or, if you have a question, get in touch with our team.