You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox

Australian woman Lynette Rowe who was born without arms and legs because of thalidomide has settled her case for a multi-million dollar sum - and other Australians and New Zealanders may soon follow suit.

Compensation from the UK company Diageo plc will provide Ms Rowe with care for the rest of her life, relieving her ageing parents who have dedicated themselves to her needs for the past 50 years.

Thalidomide drugs were distributed in Australia and New Zealand around 1960 and 1961 by Distillers, which became part of Diageo in 1997.

Ms Rowe’s lawyer Peter Gordon, from Gordon Legal, says negotiations will now begin on the remaining cases.

“This is a great outcome for a wonderful family. The amount of the settlement will remain private but I can say it is a multi-million dollar amount and will be sufficient to provide a very good level of care for Lyn for the rest of her life.

“For most of the last month, while this settlement was being discussed, Lyn’s concern has been not so much for herself but instead for the plight of other unrecognised thalidomiders in Australia and New Zealand.

“She has insisted that they get an opportunity to put their cases through a fair and equitable process. Diageo has done the right thing and made that promise to Lyn.

“The result in my opinion is fair and consistent with the compassionate and understanding approach I saw Diageo take to these cases in 2010 when they agreed to a further ex gratia package of assistance to the thalidomide survivors who had settled their common law claims back in the 1970s.”

Lyn Rowe said she was proud of the result.

“It is great that my case will bring about good things for other people too. It shows you don’t need arms and legs to change the world. Like I always say: see the person, not the disability.”

Ms Rowe thanked Diageo for their positive attitude to her case and the claims of other thalidomiders. “Diageo says they will consider other claims in good faith and I believe them,” she said.

Lyn’s father Ian Rowe said he and his wife Wendy are very proud of their daughter.

“Lyn was always prepared to go to trial to get the right result and Wendy and I are incredibly proud of her determination and persistence.

“Those pills that Wendy and thousands of other women took 50 years ago have caused so much heartache and suffering but at least something positive is now being done to put some things right.

“We are also grateful to our legal team for their work for Lyn, and to the hundreds of Australians who sent messages of support.”

Slater and Gordon’s Michael Magazanik, who with Peter Gordon conducted Ms Rowe’s claim, said the legal action had also been against Grunenthal, a German pharmaceutical company, which invented thalidomide and then licensed other companies (including Distillers) to sell it around the world.

“Grunenthal started by trying unsuccessfully to get Lyn's claim kicked out of Australia and into the German courts. In other words Grunenthal tried to force a limbless woman and her elderly parents to travel to the other side of the world to try and bring their case in a country where they don’t speak the language. Then Grunenthal tried – and failed – to delay the trial date and strike out Lyn’s claim. Now they have refused to contribute to the settlement.

“The facts about Grunenthal and thalidomide need to come out. For example, the thalidomide in every pill taken by pregnant Australian women in the 1950s and 60s – including by Lyn’s mother - was made by Grunenthal at their own factory in Germany.

“Grunenthal never tested the drug on pregnant animals or followed up its effect in pregnant women, yet assured doctors the drug was exceptionally safe.

“Many of our clients would love to see Grunenthal held to account for their global actions on thalidomide. Grunenthal likes to say it did nothing wrong in relation to thalidomide but we challenge Grunenthal to make public its own thalidomide documents and let the public decide for themselves what they think of Grunenthal’s behaviour.”

Mr Magazanik said it was particularly pleasing that Diageo had agreed to include New Zealand claimants in the settlement discussions as well as claimants from all parts of Australia.

“Diageo says it wants to negotiate those claims in good faith and we welcome those sentiments.

“I have been to New Zealand this year to interview witnesses and speak with thalidomiders. We’ve always regarded New Zealand as a very important part of this case.”

Mr Gordon said the process of considering other claims has already begun and two other claims were well advanced.

“We are pleased to have resolved a process with Diageo for good faith negotiations to take place in Melbourne. We have been contacted by over 100 people. We will work through their claims as quickly as possible, although this is a complex issue. ”

During the process to consider other claims Lynette Rowe will remain the representative plaintiff unless otherwise ordered by the Court. She is proud to do so. Her lawyers will seek an adjournment in the trial due to begin on October 8 until at least August 2013 to allow this process to consider other claims to be worked through. At that time, any unresolved claims may go on against the current defendants including Grunenthal.

The next step in the class action is to close the class. Any thalidomiders in Australia or New Zealand who have not already registered with Gordon Legal or Slater and Gordon should consider doing so urgently.

Mr Gordon says the Lynette Rowe case has been a great opportunity to right some historic wrongs.

“Many of these people have battled horrendous difficulties for 50 years without help or justice. We want to ensure all thalidomiders have an opportunity to get justice.”

See other past Slater and Gordon past Class Actions here.

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

Thank you for your feedback.

Related blog posts

What's in a name: the story behind Slater and Gordon

While Slater and Gordon has had many partners and illustrious alumni who have walked it’s corridors throughout its 85 years, Bill Slater’s and Hugh Gordon’s passion for ensuring access to justice for those who would not otherwise have a voice has continued to shape the firm. That passion lives on in Slater and Gordon’s name, it’s values, and most importantly, its people. William (Bill) Slater knew he wanted to practise law when he was ten years old. It was around the turn of the 20th century and Bill was standing in a Melbourne court after the police had caught him and some of his mates skinny-dipping in the Yarra River on a hot summer’s day. After being marched from the...

Bill Slater and Hugh Gordon
Understanding medical confidentiality and privacy laws for health professionals

As a health professional—whether you’re a doctor, nurse, technician or assistant, to name just a few—you have a rewarding yet challenging task. You’re faced with an endless diversity of patients, medical conditions and circumstances. You use your technical training and your professional judgement to meet the standards expected of you. And in one way or another, you’ll find yourself navigating legal frameworks affecting you as a health professional. Privacy and confidentiality are two key areas of the law that impact what you can and can’t do with the information entrusted to you by your patients. As a medical negligence lawyer, I’ve seen firsthand how many healthcare...

Medical Record Papers Cropped
James Hardie and the fight for future asbestos victims

L-R in the above image: Greg Combet (former ACTU Secretary), Bernie Banton, Ken Fowlie For many decades, the deadly legacy of asbestos dust has been claiming innocent victims in Australia. From the early days of asbestos mining at Wittenoom to the more recent saga of building-product manufacturer James Hardie, the legal ramifications continue, as does the suffering. Since the 1980s, Slater and Gordon has played a lead role in the battle for compensation on behalf of many of the nation’s asbestos victims. Having won landmark cases on behalf of Wittenoom workers, Slater and Gordon again took up the asbestos compensation fight in the early 2000s. In 2001, finally acknowledging its role in...

James Hardie Blog