You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox

Blog Only Rat

The Battle of the Brewery is now legendary - the fight of the AMWU and the ETU and its members against Carlton & United Breweries. In June 2016, CUB through its subcontractor sacked the maintenance workforce of fitters and electricians at its brewery in Melbourne and told the workers they could reapply for their jobs with a 65% cut to wages. If CUB thought they’d have an easy win, they were wrong.

The unions quickly established a picket outside the brewery in Abbotsford. The office windows of the boss were in direct sight. It wasn’t an ordinary picket. It was an occupation. While there was a Council permit in place for a mobile scaffold and two vehicles, the site continued to expand. Soon there were three stacked shipping containers with stairs, toilets, trucks and other vehicles. There were loud speakers and horns. And who could forget the presence of a giant inflatable rat called “Scabby” that had made his home outside the brewery.

The need for updated road/footpath occupation and planning permits became urgent. The Council and police came under pressure from CUB to remove the structures.

CUB complained under the Public Health and Wellbring Act 2012 (Vic) that the picket was a public nuisance and that the presence of the scaffold interfered with the use and enjoyment of the site. They alleged the nuisance included people congregating in large numbers, intimidation, interference with contractors delivering goods, blocked entrances and the emission of noise. They said Scabby was in the way and that the site was dangerous to health and offensive.

There were no permits allowing Scabby and the structures to remain. Scabby faced eviction.

It was at that point that the unions asked Slater and Gordon to step in to save Scabby. Our work was done on a pro-bono basis. The team in property and planning (usually better known for their work representing owners facing compulsory property acquisition) went to work. Draftspersons, town planners, surveyors and traffic management consultants were involved. A Traffic Management Plan and a Survey Plan were prepared to apply for a new Road Occupation Permit and Planning Permit.

There was extensive dialogue with Council to meet all their requirements – from crash barrier protections and minimum footpath access distances to providing public liability insurance, reducing the volume on speakers and ensuring Scabby didn’t block driveways. Scabby featured prominently in correspondence although could only be called the “Rat”. Slater and Gordon argued that the industrial campaign was an important and significant exercise in the defence and promotion of workers’ rights. We said that any inconvenience was proportionate and justifiable in the circumstances.

Within weeks the permits were issued. The picket would remain for 6 months in total – with all the permissions that were needed, and awaiting CUB’s eventual defeat in December 2016.

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

Thank you for your feedback.

Related blog posts

Employment Law
Injured migrant food delivery workers can’t afford medical costs or time off to recover if inju …

Former Uber Eats rider Bruna Correa had only been in Australia for three months when she was car-doored by a driver getting out of a parked vehicle, while delivering food in Sydney last year. She required two surgeries, four months off work and three months’ worth of physiotherapy. When the driver’s door flung open, she fell off her bike and recalls seeing her arm hit the ground, breaking her wrist before the ambulance came. After realising she would no longer receive income to support herself, she sought legal support to lodge a Compulsory Third Party (CTP) claim. This meant she was supported by weekly payments to cover her lost income through her CTP claim which have now come to an...

Bruna prior to accident cropped
Employment Law
Life after lockdown: what are your rights with returning to work?

COVID-19 has changed many things in our lives. It has made us adapt to new social norms of staying 1.5 meters apart, it has introduced face masks to our daily lives, and it has caused a mass disruption to the way we work. But now that many lockdown restrictions are easing and we start to return to more “normal” ways of working, what are your rights to continue to work flexibly? If your employer wants you to return to the office, then in most cases you’ll have to go back unless their request is unreasonable or it’s unsafe. Whether it’s safe for you to return will depend on factors such as the nature of your employer’s business and how it’s carried out, whether your employer is...

Flexible working arrangements in COVID
Employment Law
National industrial manslaughter legislation would save lives

Strong national industrial manslaughter legislation is what Australian workers need, but a national law is not supported by the Federal Government. As a Workers’ Compensation lawyer in national law firm, I see the lack of consistency across the states and believe there should be national standards to protect all workers. Workers should feel safe no matter what state they live in. The recent death of a worker in Sydney’s Port Botany who was crushed between two shipping containers, and delays in commitment from the NSW Government to investigate industrial manslaughter laws, highlight the need for national reform. In the meantime, the NSW State Government needs to take fast action on...

Outdoor construction worksafe

We're here to help

Start your online claim check now. Or, if you have a question, get in touch with our team.