You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox


Slater and Gordon successfully acted for the Independent Education Union of Western Australia against the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Perth (the provider of Catholic Education in Western Australia) in an interpretation of an agreement dispute before the Western Australian Industrial Relations Commission.

The IEU and the Catholic Education Office were in dispute about the proper construction of clauses 23 and 24 of the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Perth Teachers Enterprise Agreement 2012.

The Catholic Education Office made changes to work hours of teachers and the IEU argued that clause 23 required the Catholic Education Office to consult with the IEU prior to making an alteration to the work hours. The Catholic Education Office refused to consult with the IEU, arguing that the change to the work hours was minor and not a “significant effect” so as to enliven the consultation requirements under clause 23.

Clause 24 expressly referred to a Teacher Workloads policy and provided that the Policy could only be changed with the agreement of both parties. The Policy set the maximum work hours of a teacher. By changing the work hours of teachers the Catholic Education Office unilaterally changed the Policy. We argued the plain and ordinary interpretation of clause 24 meant that a change to the Policy could only be made with mutual agreement.

The WAIRC agreed with our submission that it is clear from the wording of clause 23 of the EBA that any alteration of hours of work is a ‘significant effect’ so as to enliven the consultation requirements in clause 23. The WAIRC further agreed that the Catholic Education Office cannot unilaterally change the Policy where there is a change to work hours of a teacher.

The favourable interpretation potentially opened the door to a penalties claim against the Catholic Education Office for a breach of the EBA.

Independent Education Union of Western Australia, Union of Employees (IEUWA) v Roman Catholic Archbishop of Perth [2016] WAIRC 00747.

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

Related blog posts

Ensure you get all of your entitlements as a casual worker over summer

This time of year is a busy time for workers, especially in spaces such as retail and hospitality. With the 12th consecutive interest rate rise by the RBA; we understand the pressures many may be facing due to the cost-of-living. It makes sense that many would be considering undertaking a second job over the busy period to earn some extra cash to keep up. While you might want to pick up the extra shifts it’s important to check you’re getting properly compensated and know your entitlements. Many people may become a ‘Christmas casual’ over the break. If you are working as a casual, then you’re entitled to be paid a ‘casual loading’. Casual loading is an extra payment made on...

Ensure you get all of your entitlements as a casual worker over summer
Can a thumbs up be an agreement to a contract?

How often do you use a thumbs up to reply to something or say yes? It’s a quick and easy way to shoot off a reply, even for official documents. But you might want to be careful what you’re agreeing to. Canadian Judge has ruled that the ‘thumbs-up’ emoji is just as valid as a signature and ordered a farmer to pay $61,442 AUD for an unfulfilled contract. Justice Keene said that courts need to adapt to the “new reality” of how people communicate. The farmer argued that even though the picture of the contract was texted to him, he was simply agreeing that he would review the contract at a later date. The Justice wrote that, “this court readily acknowledges that a 👍 emoji is a...

Can an emoji be legally binding
What to do if you’re being pressured to work overtime and through breaks

Alarming statistics are showing that staff shortages are increasing workload and workers are being pressured to work through breaks and work unpaid overtime. In a recent study from Roy Morgan, commissioned by Slater and Gordon, more than half of manual or frontline workers said their workload had increased, largely due to pressure to work overtime or through their breaks. In addition, more than half of workers (59%) felt that workload had increased since the start of the pandemic, largely due to staff shortages. These statistics are concerning, especially for frontline and manual workers, where an increase in workload and decrease in rest can lead to costly health and safety risks. The...

Two men working overtime and through breaks

We're here to help

Start your online claim check now. Or, if you have a question, get in touch with our team.