You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox

By now many of us would have heard or seen the news about contaminated frozen berry products imported into Australia, with a number of people across the country having contracted the Hepatitis A virus after consuming the berries.

We’ve been contacted by a number of people who are obviously concerned about their health and legal rights. There is a lot of information available to people about the symptoms of Hepatitis A and what they can do if they suspect they’ve contracted the virus.

The nature of this contamination scare may also give rise to claims for compensation, and there are a number of legal issues to consider.

Legal claims

  • Manufacturers of goods have a number of stringent obligations towards consumers, including a requirement that any goods they produce must be free from safety defects.
  • Food products contaminated with a virus like Hepatitis A would obviously fail to meet the safety standards that people are entitled to except for a product of that nature.
  • The Australian Consumer Law gives rights to individuals who were injured as a result of a safety defect in goods to claim compensation against the relevant manufacturer.
  • Australian distributers of imported goods can be held responsible for products’ safety to the same extent that they would if they had grown or manufactured them themselves.
  • Given the number of people who may have been exposed to the virus, and who are suffering similar complications as a result, the prospect of a class action against the manufacturer is being actively pursued.
  • Anyone who is diagnosed with Hepatitis A after consuming the recalled frozen berries should seek legal advice about their circumstances.
  • If the current Hepatitis A scare is definitively linked to the manufacturer, Patties Foods Ltd, then we would hope it will do the right thing and compensate those affected without forcing them to take legal action.

What you can do

  • If you’re concerned that you may have contracted the virus or that you might be experiencing symptoms related to it after having consumed the affected berries, the most important first step is to speak to your doctor.
  • One of the difficulties that can often emerge in claims concerning food contamination is in proving that people acquired and consumed the affected food, as many people tend not to keep shopping receipts or unused foods for long periods of time.
  • Victoria’s Chief Health Officer, Dr Rosemary Lester, has advised consumers to immediately dispose of any packs of recalled berries. We would encourage anyone diagnosed with Hepatitis A who is still in possession of a partially-used pack of recalled berries to contact Slater and Gordon to discuss how best to follow this directive while ensuring that relevant evidence is preserved
  • For anyone who thinks they might be affected by the recalled frozen berries, we would recommend that they hold on to any receipts or other proof of their purchase or use of the berries.
  • Anyone who has thrown out their receipts might want to take some time to write down whatever they can recall about when and where they purchased and consumed the berries, to ensure this information isn’t forgotten

Health impacts

  • The symptoms and consequences of contracting hepatitis A can be very unpleasant, and can take some time to fully subside.
  • You should contact a health professional if you believe you have the symptoms of Hepatitis A.
  • Because the virus could sometimes take several weeks to be detected, it is likely that more cases may emerge in the near future.

Anyone who believes they may have contracted hepatitis A after consuming the recalled frozen berry products is encouraged to contact Slater and Gordon on 1800 555 777.

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

Thank you for your feedback.

Latest blog posts

Family Law
Young Australians and the trend of 'starter marriages'

When a young couple in love walks down the aisle it's more than likely they believe their relationship will last forever. But sadly, in Australia more than 40 per cent of all divorces happen before the couple makes it to their 10th wedding anniversary – and overall divorce rates are highest within the 25 to 34 year age group (ABS 2009). These short-term marriages along with high divorce rates among younger Australians could be part of a world-wide trend that many people are calling 'starter marriages'. Starter marriages generally end within the first five years, with couples often calling it quits before they have children. Many Hollywood celebrities are notorious for their short-term...

Financial Negligence
Will the Murray Report raise standards in the financial advice industry?

You may be surprised to learn that thorough professional standards are not yet in place in the financial advice industry. So what level of care and expertise do you have a right to expect and will the Federal Government’s latest response bring positive change? This week the Government released its response to the Financial System Inquiry Report – known as the Murray Report – which included recommendations to raise the competency of financial advice providers. The Government has committed to develop legislation that will ‘raise the professional, ethical and educational standards of financial advisers’. The proposal is that legislation will be passed to ensure that advisers: The...

Family Law
When can a child decide who to live with?

When is my child able to decide for themselves about who they live with? At what age can a child’s views be more influential than that of their parents? The weight given to the views of children in parenting proceedings depends on the age of the child but importantly, it also depends very much upon the maturity, insight and understanding that particular child has. There is a common misconception that in Family Law parenting disputes about with whom a child will live, a child will have the deciding vote when they reach the age of 12. This is not the case. There will come a time where a child is able to ‘vote with their feet’ so to speak and place themselves physically where they want...

Teenager Step

We're here to help

Start your online claim check now. Or, if you have a question, get in touch with our team.