You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox

Distracted Driver Resized

Almost every adult in Australia has driven a motor vehicle and almost every Australian, young and old, has almost certainly been a passenger at some stage in their lives. Many of us are parents and can relate to ferrying children around to various sports training, games, school runs and appointments.

Vehicles are part of everyday life but very little thought is given each time we get behind the wheel as to how our actions can impact upon the lives of others.

As a personal injury lawyer, I see firsthand the impact that inattention on our roads can have. There is obviously the financial impact including at-fault drivers having to pay property damage costs, but what is most concerning is the physical and psychological impact when people are injured in accidents.

So what is your duty of care as a driver? The concept of “duty of care” comes from an old case from the United Kingdom where Lord Atkin in Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] laid down the basic test adopted in Australia: “You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour.” As a driver, this duty of care not to cause foreseeable harm to others extends to both passengers and pedestrians.

As drivers we also have a duty to ensure we keep a proper lookout. In a recent Supreme Court decision in the ACT (Steed v McDougall [2019]), a driver breached his duty of care by failing to keep a proper lookout when he was reversing from his driveway and collided with an postie on a motorbike.

The Court said the driver should have known the path was used by motorcycle riders including posties, that those riders might be distracted, that the view was obscured by foliage and significant injuries could occur from a collision. The Court also said the driver owed a duty of care whereby he could have minimised the risk associated with reversing onto the path by stopping the car and taking advantage of the available visibility before driving over the path. However, the Court held the postie contributorily negligent to the extent of 35 per cent for failing to keep a proper lookout for himself.

This case is an interesting example of how the simple act of reversing out of your own driveway can lead to an accident and to a breach of your duty of care. It also demonstrates that we must take care to look out for our own safety regardless of whether we are on a road or on a footpath.

Technological advancement means we have multiple devices in the car with us like mobile phones, tablets and navigation software to distract us. These items can be a cause of driver distraction and lead to accidents and injuries. In fact, on average 25 people are killed and 1,235 are seriously injured each year on Queensland roads alone as a result of crashes where driver distraction has played a part.

Just recently, a Queensland mother was filmed driving with both hands off the wheel as she used her mobile phone with her two children in the back seat. It is up to us as individuals to make a positive commitment to ignoring technologies and focus our attention solely on driving to ensure we do not injure ourselves, our loved ones and other road users.

If you are involved in a motor vehicle accident, please make sure you write down the name and contact details of the other person or people involved (as well as any witnesses). Take photographs of the vehicles involved and the accident scene, report the accident to police even if you consider it to be a minor accident and refrain from making any admissions regarding responsibility.

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

Related blog posts

Is a delayed diagnosis medical negligence?

An estimated 140,000 cases of diagnostic errors happen in Australia every year. The reality is that medicine is a complex field and people who work in healthcare are still humans that can make mistakes. If you’ve walked out of a doctor’s appointment feeling like your symptoms were dismissed or a test wasn’t ordered on time, it makes sense to ask yourself whether you’re experiencing poor treatment or even medical negligence.  Delayed diagnosis happens when your medical condition is identified much later than it should have been based on a reasonable standard of care. This delay can cause your condition to worsen which can make treatment much more difficult.  The law doesn't say a...

Med negligence blog woman sitting in appointment
Justice for survivors of institutional child abuse in New South Wales

A recent High Court ruling, together with changes to legislation in New South Wales, has fundamentally changed the legal landscape for survivors of institutional child abuse. Victim-survivors who were abused in institutions now have clearer, stronger pathways to seek justice and compensation. Institutions are now much more likely to be held liable for abuse perpetrated by people acting in positions of authority and care. The Court clarified that when an institution places a child in someone’s care, it has a legal responsibility to ensure reasonable care is taken. This means that institutions can no longer hide behind arguments that the abuse was purely the criminal act of an individual. ...

Image high court of australia
Justice for survivors of institutional child abuse

A recent High Court ruling, together with changes to legislation in Victoria and the ACT, has fundamentally changed the legal landscape for survivors of institutional child abuse. Victim-survivors who were abused in institutions now have clearer, stronger pathways to seek justice and compensation. In the past, victim-survivors were unable to pursue compensation for child abuse if the abuser was not technically a formal employee. This left a loophole where institutions could escape accountability for the actions of people they placed in positions of trust and power. “Vicarious liability” is when a person or organisation is held legally responsible for the wrongful or criminal acts of...

Image high court of australia

We're here to help

Start your online claim check now. Or, if you have a question, get in touch with our team.