You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox


The high-profile trial of Cardinal George Pell and his application for leave to appeal against the convictions being accepted by the High Court, as well as the Royal Commission in recent years, have shined a light on sex abuse in Australia.

Bravehearts Foundation provides advice and support to those affected by child sexual assault. They provide child protection training and education programs, specialist child sexual assault counselling and support services.

We have formed an alliance with Bravehearts Foundation who work very hard to prevent child sexual assault in our society. We have also linked up with Knowmore, who provide legal advice to abuse survivors by arming them with information about the justice and redress options available to them.

Slater and Gordon lawyers has been running educational workshops in Townsville and Cairns this month, in addition to other North Queensland communities with remote access over the coming months, helping survivors of abuse navigate and understand their entitlements under the Federal Government’s National Redress Scheme. This presents a great opportunity for survivors to ask questions and seek legal advice.

Knowmore encourage and help survivors to apply for redress or other forms of action by helping them lodge complaints with police, find old records and understand legal processes and connect with specialist counselling and support services.

It is so important for survivors of abuse to also understand the other options available to them. The ability for applications to be processed under the redress scheme are dependent on whether or not the institution where the abuse occurred has signed up to the scheme.

The National Redress Scheme set up for abuse survivors has been plagued by delays and many people do require support accessing it effectively and legal advice regarding whether or not it is the best option for them.

For some, it will be the best option for them. The scheme is a good option for survivors that may not have capacity to pursue a civil claim, for a number of reasons.

But to date, it has not always provided the quick access to justice and redress that survivors had hoped for. Recently, more institutions have joined the Scheme, which is good to hear as it means seeking redress is an option for them.

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

We're here to help

Start your online claim check now. Or, if you have a question, get in touch with our team.

Related blog posts

Is a delayed diagnosis medical negligence?

An estimated 140,000 cases of diagnostic errors happen in Australia every year. The reality is that medicine is a complex field and people who work in healthcare are still humans that can make mistakes. If you’ve walked out of a doctor’s appointment feeling like your symptoms were dismissed or a test wasn’t ordered on time, it makes sense to ask yourself whether you’re experiencing poor treatment or even medical negligence.  Delayed diagnosis happens when your medical condition is identified much later than it should have been based on a reasonable standard of care. This delay can cause your condition to worsen which can make treatment much more difficult.  The law doesn't say a...

Med negligence blog woman sitting in appointment
Justice for survivors of institutional child abuse in New South Wales

A recent High Court ruling, together with changes to legislation in New South Wales, has fundamentally changed the legal landscape for survivors of institutional child abuse. Victim-survivors who were abused in institutions now have clearer, stronger pathways to seek justice and compensation. Institutions are now much more likely to be held liable for abuse perpetrated by people acting in positions of authority and care. The Court clarified that when an institution places a child in someone’s care, it has a legal responsibility to ensure reasonable care is taken. This means that institutions can no longer hide behind arguments that the abuse was purely the criminal act of an individual. ...

Image high court of australia
Justice for survivors of institutional child abuse

A recent High Court ruling, together with changes to legislation in Victoria and the ACT, has fundamentally changed the legal landscape for survivors of institutional child abuse. Victim-survivors who were abused in institutions now have clearer, stronger pathways to seek justice and compensation. In the past, victim-survivors were unable to pursue compensation for child abuse if the abuser was not technically a formal employee. This left a loophole where institutions could escape accountability for the actions of people they placed in positions of trust and power. “Vicarious liability” is when a person or organisation is held legally responsible for the wrongful or criminal acts of...

Image high court of australia