You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox

We are continuing to serve clients during the COVID-19 pandemic More Info.

Shutterstock 758438593

A doctor, just like other professionals, owes you duty of care when you receive medical treatment. When this duty of care is breached, you can suffer physical and psychological harm which can give rise to a claim for compensation.

Medical regulators also have a responsibility to ensure that the general public is being protected, in particular, in circumstances where there are reports of multiple or serious complaints against a health professional.

Maria’s story

When Maria Robertson* went to the Croydon Day Surgery for a procedure, she expected that she’d be treated by competent medical professionals. So when she saw in the media months later that there had been a wave of women contracting Hepatitis C at the Croydon Day Surgery, she felt disbelief.

As a result Maria undertook testing for Hepatitis C and was subsequently diagnosed with the virus. Maria was then treated for the virus, in an effort to cure her. Throughout the treatment, she couldn’t quite shake the feeling that what had happened to her was unfair and had to be prevented from happening again.

Maria joined 60 other women in a class action run by Slater and Gordon Lawyers seeking damages for their pain and suffering, medical and out-of-pocket expenses, and economic losses, from Croydon Hospital Pty Ltd (the corporate entity of the Croydon Day Surgery), Dr Mark Schulberg, the proprietor of the clinic, and the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency, the successor in law to the Medical Practitioners Board of Victoria, which was responsible for the registration and regulation of doctors in Victoria during the relevant period.

The class action is believed to be the first time that a personal injury class action was lodged against a medical regulator in Australia. The class action settled for $13.75 million.

Slater and Gordon is passionate about helping women like Maria and is currently investigating a class action against Dr Gayed and the New South Wales medical regulators to assist women who have suffered physical or psychological harm following treatment from Dr Gayed.

New report raises concerns

In November 2018, Gail Furness released a report regarding the conduct of the New South Wales Medical Council and New South Wales Medical Board, in response to complaints made about former gyaecologist and obstetrician, Dr Emil Gayed. For the experienced litigators at Slater and Gordon Lawyers, the report raised concerns about the conduct of the medical regulators.

Andrew Baker, Practice Group Leader, who worked to secure the settlement in the Hepatitis C class action and is currently leading the team investigating a potential claim against New South Wales medical regulators and Dr Gayed, said

In a situation like this where there are more than 40 complaints against one doctor, it is important to investigate the misconduct of the doctor involved, but this situation also raises serious questions around our system of regulation and oversight of the healthcare profession. What we have heard from the women affected is that complaints weren’t addressed and questionable conduct was ignored, or not followed up, and the result has been life-changing for some of Dr Gayed’s former patients.

Register your details

If you or anyone who you know was a patient of Dr Gayed, our experienced class actions team may be able to assist. You can register your contact details here or you can contact us on medicalregulatorclaims@slatergordon.com.au or (03) 9602 6840 for a free consultation about your rights.

Article written by Hannah Lewis and Laura Nigro.

* Name changed to protect the identity of the victim.

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

Thank you for your feedback.

Related blog posts

Class Action
Large-scale privacy breach claims in Australia

Breaches of people’s personal data have become an increasing problem over the past few years in Australia. These breaches, which compromise people’s sensitive and personal information, have tended to happen on a large scale by companies and governments failing to safely secure personal data. These breaches of personal privacy have the potential to impact the welfare, safety and well-being of those affected. According to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC), millions of Australians have already been impacted by numerous data breaches in 2019. A recent example of this, in October 2019, was when Optus advised almost 50,000 customers that their personal information...

Data breach resized
Class Action
Update on Colonial First State class action

This blog piece provides an update about the class action against Colonial First State and Commonwealth Bank (CBA), the first class action launched in our ‘Get Your Super Back’ campaign. The Court recently granted us permission to file an amended statement of claim that adds two new claims to the case, relating to term deposits and adviser commissions. The first claim extends the case to cover term deposits. Members of Colonial can choose to place part of their super in term deposits. The only term deposits Colonial offers are with CBA, even though other banks offered higher interest rates. We allege that Colonial should have demanded higher interest rates from CBA or offered term...

Bank Building
Class Action
Competing Shareholder Class Actions

The growth of shareholder class actions in Australia over the past two decades has seen the regime take centre stage in the enforcement of the Australian disclosure regime. For companies, the threat of shareholder litigation is a powerful incentive to disclose information in a timely fashion, particularly if it is bad news. For individual investors, these class actions provide an opportunity for losses to be recouped following a preventable disclosure failure by a listed company. Just as importantly, with a well-functioning disclosure regime, investors can avoid losses on shares in companies that have disclosed bad news in a timely manner. The process of a typical shareholder class action...

Gavel Blog