You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox

Social media posts may no longer be as ephemeral as first thought following the recent Federal Court judgment of Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne v Powell [2015] FCA 1110, which held that one’s social media activity was capable of amounting to misleading and deceptive conduct under the Australian Consumer Law.

The self-proclaimed ‘global ambassador for champagne’, ‘Champagne Jayne’, found herself in a fizz with the Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne (CIVC) following her affiliation and promotion of Tasmanian Sparkling wine on her social media pages.

Since 2009 Rachel Jayne Powell has promoted herself as ‘Champagne Jayne’, an educator and expert in champagne. Ms Powell has relied heavily on her social media presence in the promotion of her image and promotion of champagne.

In 2013 a number of social media posts were documented in which she made references to champagne when the products displayed were not champagne but sparkling wine.

The CIVC contended that Ms Powell used the goodwill associated with the name ‘champagne’ in the promotion of her own image. In turn they alleged that her promotion of sparkling wine under the media guise ‘Champagne Jayne’ acted to mislead and deceive potential purchasers of champagne and had subsequently tarnished the name of champagne.

Ms Powell argued that such media posts were not deceptive nor necessarily viewed or read by followers because of the fleeting nature of social media, however such a contention was not accepted.

The judgment held that Ms Powell’s conduct on her social media pages promoting sparkling wines was likely to mislead and deceive the public including people who did not know the difference between champagne and sparkling wines and thus was in contravention of s 18 of the Australian Consumer Law.

This judgment suggests that the creation of a social media image and transient nature of one’s social media activity may be more pervasive and permanent than anticipated as tweets, posts and images may have the capacity to mislead and deceive.

Got a question? Get in touch today.

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

Thank you for your feedback.

Related blog posts

Consumer and the Law
Liar loans: how mortgage brokers are putting clients at risk

The term ‘liar loans’ has been coined on the back of the Banking Royal Commission. This is because studies have shown almost 40 per cent of loan applications completed through mortgage brokers contained at least one factually incorrect statement. Whether mortgage brokers are providing lenders with incorrect information, or information that is out-of-date, they are putting themselves – and their clients – at risk. A recent study conducted by the Consumer Credit Legal Centre in New South Wales identified some mortgage brokers were breaking the law when filling out loan applications for their clients. Common examples included brokers suggesting their clients provide a different answer...

Planning desk close up documentresize
Consumer and the Law
How to lodge a complaint with Australian Financial Complaints Authority

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) acts as the middleperson between financial firms and consumers or small businesses, offering free and independent dispute resolution services. It deals with complaints about financial advice, insurance, banking and superannuation products and services. While the time limit to lodge a complaint to AFCA is usually between two and six years, the Australian Government recently created the opportunity for those with complaints up to 10 years old to come forward. This means consumers and small businesses have until 30 June 2020 to lodge complaints dating back to 1 January 2008. To lodge a complaint, you must follow AFCA’s process. It is...

How to lodge a complaint with Australian Financial Complaints Authority
Business Law
Proposed Changes to the Franchising Code of Conduct

Franchising is big business in Australia, with approximately 1,120 franchise systems and 79,000 franchise units operating nationally1. As franchising is a diverse sector with characteristics that are unique from other business models, franchises are governed by a mandatory Franchising Code of Conduct (Franchising Code).2 The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services recently completed an inquiry into the operation and effectiveness of the Franchising Code and has released the Fairness in Franchising Report (Report).3 Some of the key findings and recommendations of the report are discussed below. The Committee recommends that the Australian Government establish an...

Waitress In Black Apron Upload

We're here to help

Start your online claim check now. Or, if you have a question, get in touch with our team.