You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox

If you are looking for information on Westpac CCI class action click here

Conflict

Business partnerships, whether incorporated or not, require a commercial approach if the relationship sours.

Too many times I’ve seen former co-owners of a business fail to see the obvious solution to settling the dispute. In some circumstances the conduct of parties is so churlish they could make an acrimonious divorced couple blush.

Despite the complex arrangements sometimes associated with companies, courts take a simple approach. In the case of an unincorporated partnership, the court will simply order that the partnership be dissolved; there be an account of profits; the debts of the business paid and the balance to be split equally.

In the case of incorporated partnerships, if evidence can be given that the business can continue to trade, the court will order that the shares be valued and the remaining partner be paid their fair share.

What causes business disputes?

In many cases I see, business partners become blinded by acrimony and the inability to resolve issues for the following reasons:

  • One partner having an over inflated view on the value of the business (usually a concern about future earnings)
  • The extent of financial and non-financial contributions alleged to have been made by each of them;
  • Allegations of:
    • unauthorised profit taking;
    • dubious accounting practices;
    • breach of their statutory or fiduciary duties;
    • breach of the terms of the partnership or shareholder agreement;
  • Who owns which client’s or customers;
  • Who should retain the business assets?
  • Whether the “selling” business partner should be restrained from competing; and
  • Any intellectual or trademark property issues; or
  • Personal resentment.

Unless you are totally satisfied that the cases above are worth fighting for, former business parties should work and concentrate on settling accounts, including creditors, and apply a commercially practical solution in the same way they started the business.

When it comes to business disputes or disagreements, Former business partners can avoid the cost of litigation by:

  • Agreeing to a payout;
  • Agree to a valuation by an experienced accounting firm, with each party making their own submission on the question of any contributions or factors to be considered; or
  • Involve the assistance of lawyers and the company accountant to assist in the resolution via the mediation process.

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

Thank you for your feedback.

Related blog posts

Consumer and the Law
Liar loans: how mortgage brokers are putting clients at risk

The term ‘liar loans’ has been coined on the back of the Banking Royal Commission. This is because studies have shown almost 40 per cent of loan applications completed through mortgage brokers contained at least one factually incorrect statement. Whether mortgage brokers are providing lenders with incorrect information, or information that is out-of-date, they are putting themselves – and their clients – at risk. A recent study conducted by the Consumer Credit Legal Centre in New South Wales identified some mortgage brokers were breaking the law when filling out loan applications for their clients. Common examples included brokers suggesting their clients provide a different answer...

Planning desk close up documentresize
Consumer and the Law
How to lodge a complaint with Australian Financial Complaints Authority

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) acts as the middleperson between financial firms and consumers or small businesses, offering free and independent dispute resolution services. It deals with complaints about financial advice, insurance, banking and superannuation products and services. While the time limit to lodge a complaint to AFCA is usually between two and six years, the Australian Government recently created the opportunity for those with complaints up to 10 years old to come forward. This means consumers and small businesses have until 30 June 2020 to lodge complaints dating back to 1 January 2008. To lodge a complaint, you must follow AFCA’s process. It is...

How to lodge a complaint with Australian Financial Complaints Authority
Business Law
Proposed Changes to the Franchising Code of Conduct

Franchising is big business in Australia, with approximately 1,120 franchise systems and 79,000 franchise units operating nationally1. As franchising is a diverse sector with characteristics that are unique from other business models, franchises are governed by a mandatory Franchising Code of Conduct (Franchising Code).2 The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services recently completed an inquiry into the operation and effectiveness of the Franchising Code and has released the Fairness in Franchising Report (Report).3 Some of the key findings and recommendations of the report are discussed below. The Committee recommends that the Australian Government establish an...

Waitress In Black Apron Upload

We're here to help

Start your online claim check now. Or, if you have a question, get in touch with our team.