You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox

Instead of marching straight to court, the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) provides an accessible and alternative method of resolving disputes between consumers or businesses and financial service providers who are members of FOS.

How FOS works

FOS aims to determine disputes in a timely and cost-effective manner, and is an attractive forum for consumers where the issue or amount in dispute might be disproportionate to the cost of pursuing their claim through the court system.

The FOS process is simple and straightforward – in a nutshell:

  • the applicant lodges a dispute with FOS setting out in full detail the basis of the dispute and provides copies of all relevant documentation;
  • the financial services provider provides its response to the applicant’s dispute and also provides copies of all relevant documentation;
  • FOS reviews the dispute and notifies the parties of its decision (known as a Recommendation), including the reasoning behind that decision – FOS determines disputes having regard to the relevant law, good industry practice, codes of practice and may also consider previous FOS decisions.

FOS also has its own ‘appeal’ process:

  • either party may request a review of FOS decision and provide any further information relevant to the review;
  • the other party also has the opportunity to provide any further information relevant to the review; and
  • FOS conducts a further review the dispute and notifies the parties of its final decision (known as a Determination).

Limits and exclusions

Not all disputes can be heard by FOS. The cases which FOS will not consider are set out in its Terms of Reference, which is available from FOS’ website (

In particular, FOS may not consider a dispute where the applicant’s claim is worth more than $500,000. In addition, there are caps on the total value of the remedy that may be decided on by FOS – the monetary cap varies depending upon the nature of the dispute (these are also set out in FOS’ Terms of Reference). For example, for disputes against financial advisors for inappropriate advice, the maximum amount an applicant can recover under FOS is $309,000 (excluding costs and interest).

There are also time limits on lodging a dispute with FOS. The time limits vary depending upon the nature of the dispute however is generally between 2-6 years.

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

Thank you for your feedback.

Related blog posts

Consumer and the Law
Liar loans: how mortgage brokers are putting clients at risk

The term ‘liar loans’ has been coined on the back of the Banking Royal Commission. This is because studies have shown almost 40 per cent of loan applications completed through mortgage brokers contained at least one factually incorrect statement. Whether mortgage brokers are providing lenders with incorrect information, or information that is out-of-date, they are putting themselves – and their clients – at risk. A recent study conducted by the Consumer Credit Legal Centre in New South Wales identified some mortgage brokers were breaking the law when filling out loan applications for their clients. Common examples included brokers suggesting their clients provide a different answer...

Planning desk close up documentresize
Consumer and the Law
How to lodge a complaint with Australian Financial Complaints Authority

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) acts as the middleperson between financial firms and consumers or small businesses, offering free and independent dispute resolution services. It deals with complaints about financial advice, insurance, banking and superannuation products and services. While the time limit to lodge a complaint to AFCA is usually between two and six years, the Australian Government recently created the opportunity for those with complaints up to 10 years old to come forward. This means consumers and small businesses have until 30 June 2020 to lodge complaints dating back to 1 January 2008. To lodge a complaint, you must follow AFCA’s process. It is...

How to lodge a complaint with Australian Financial Complaints Authority
Business Law
Proposed Changes to the Franchising Code of Conduct

Franchising is big business in Australia, with approximately 1,120 franchise systems and 79,000 franchise units operating nationally1. As franchising is a diverse sector with characteristics that are unique from other business models, franchises are governed by a mandatory Franchising Code of Conduct (Franchising Code).2 The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services recently completed an inquiry into the operation and effectiveness of the Franchising Code and has released the Fairness in Franchising Report (Report).3 Some of the key findings and recommendations of the report are discussed below. The Committee recommends that the Australian Government establish an...

Waitress In Black Apron Upload

We're here to help

Start your online claim check now. Or, if you have a question, get in touch with our team.