You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox

Are you a sole trader, or a small or large business in the building industry looking to be paid or recover a debt?

The Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 provides a process for the receipt and recovery of progress payments by a person who carries out construction work or supplies related goods or services under a construction contract.

Importantly, the Act does not apply to residential building work.

Payment Claim

Under the Act, a person seeking to be paid under a construction contract may serve a Payment Claim on the person who is liable to pay the debt.

The Payment Claim must:

  1. Identify the construction work or related goods or services;
  2. Indicate the amount of the progress payment that the claimant claims to be due;
  3. State that it is a Payment Claim made under the Act;
  4. Be served within 12 months after the construction work was last carried out or the period stated in the construction contract.

Payment Schedule

If a person who is served with a Payment Claim under the Act wishes to dispute that they are liable to make the progress payment set out in the Payment Claim, they must serve a Payment Schedule which:

  1. Identifies the Payment Claim to which it relates;
  2. Indicates the amount of the payment which the person proposes to make, including a zero payment if applicable; and
  3. Is served with 10 business days after the Payment Claim is served or within the times provided by the construction contract, whichever is the earlier.

If a Payment Schedule is not served within time, the person becomes liable to pay the claimed amount on the date that the progress payment is due. Further, the claimed amount can be enforced as a debt in Court and the claimant can give notice of its intention to suspend construction work or related goods or services.


A claimant who is served with a Payment Schedule for an amount less than the amount claimed can apply for adjudication, provided it has given appropriate notice of the adjudication application to the person from which it is claiming.

An adjudicator’s determination is usually difficult to overturn or challenge.

If a person fails to pay any part of any amount determined by the adjudicator, that amount may be enforced as a debt in Court, and construction works or the supply of related goods of services can again be suspended.

Contractors Debts Act 1997

The Contractors Debts Act 1997 provides a mechanism whereby a person who is owed money for work carried out or materials supplied can by pass a defaulting contractor and obtain payment directly from the principal who engaged the defaulting contractor. This includes monies determined to be owed by an adjudicator’s determination under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act. A debt certificate must have been obtained and a notice of claim on the principal must have been served before seeking to enforce the debt.


Whilst both the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 and the Contractors Debts Act 1997 provide a mechanism for the recovery of payments by building contractors ensuring cashflow to the industry, it is crucial that the process set out by both of the Acts is strictly followed otherwise a person may lose their ability to claim.

If you require assistance to recover a debt or you have been served with a Payment Schedule for which you need advice, please submit an enquiry or call 1800 555 777.

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

Thank you for your feedback.

Related blog posts

Consumer and the Law
Liar loans: how mortgage brokers are putting clients at risk

The term ‘liar loans’ has been coined on the back of the Banking Royal Commission. This is because studies have shown almost 40 per cent of loan applications completed through mortgage brokers contained at least one factually incorrect statement. Whether mortgage brokers are providing lenders with incorrect information, or information that is out-of-date, they are putting themselves – and their clients – at risk. A recent study conducted by the Consumer Credit Legal Centre in New South Wales identified some mortgage brokers were breaking the law when filling out loan applications for their clients. Common examples included brokers suggesting their clients provide a different answer...

Planning desk close up documentresize
Consumer and the Law
How to lodge a complaint with Australian Financial Complaints Authority

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) acts as the middleperson between financial firms and consumers or small businesses, offering free and independent dispute resolution services. It deals with complaints about financial advice, insurance, banking and superannuation products and services. While the time limit to lodge a complaint to AFCA is usually between two and six years, the Australian Government recently created the opportunity for those with complaints up to 10 years old to come forward. This means consumers and small businesses have until 30 June 2020 to lodge complaints dating back to 1 January 2008. To lodge a complaint, you must follow AFCA’s process. It is...

How to lodge a complaint with Australian Financial Complaints Authority
Business Law
Proposed Changes to the Franchising Code of Conduct

Franchising is big business in Australia, with approximately 1,120 franchise systems and 79,000 franchise units operating nationally1. As franchising is a diverse sector with characteristics that are unique from other business models, franchises are governed by a mandatory Franchising Code of Conduct (Franchising Code).2 The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services recently completed an inquiry into the operation and effectiveness of the Franchising Code and has released the Fairness in Franchising Report (Report).3 Some of the key findings and recommendations of the report are discussed below. The Committee recommends that the Australian Government establish an...

Waitress In Black Apron Upload

We're here to help

Start your online claim check now. Or, if you have a question, get in touch with our team.