You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox

We are continuing to serve clients during the COVID-19 pandemic More Info.


Businesses should review their standard-form contracts following proposed changes to Australian Consumer Law that aim to reduce the inclusion of unfair terms in small business contracts.

In many industries, for example, transport and cartage, companies require small supply businesses to enter into standard contracts which often favour one party. In some cases these contracts will contain:

  1. key performance indicators;
  2. penalty payments;
  3. extra rates and charges that can be charged for failure to comply; or
  4. unilateral termination provisions.

A term in a contract may be ‘unfair’ if it:

  • causes an insignificant balance to the rights and obligations of the parties,
  • is not necessary to protect the legitimate interests of a party and
  • would cause a detriment to one of the parties if relied upon.

As a guide, the types of provisions which may be deemed unfair include (but are not limited to) a situation where one party can:

  1. set or vary the price without the other party having the right to terminate the contract;
  2. vary the characteristics of the services to be supplied under the contract;
  3. determine whether the contract has been breached or to interpret its meaning;
  4. engage in conduct whereby a party is forced to sign a contract on a ‘a take it or leave it basis’.

Currently, protection against unfair contract terms only applies to consumer contracts. The proposed Small Business and Unfair Contract Terms Act 2015 (the Act) will extend unfair contract terms protection to small business contracts. Under the Act, a contract is a small business contract if:

  1. at the time the contract is entered into, at least one party to the contract is a business that employs fewer than 20 persons excluding casuals; and
  2. either of the following applies:
  • the upfront price payable under the contract does not exceed $300,000; or
  • the contract has a duration of more than 12 months and the upfront price payable under the contract does not exceed $1,000,000.

The Act will apply to the supply of goods or services other than financial services or products and the sale or grant of an interest in land.

If a court declares a term to be an unfair term, that term will be void and the contract will continue to bind the parties if it can operate without the inclusion of that unfair term.

To discuss any of the cases raised here, get in touch.

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

Thank you for your feedback.

Related blog posts

Consumer and the Law
Liar loans: how mortgage brokers are putting clients at risk

The term ‘liar loans’ has been coined on the back of the Banking Royal Commission. This is because studies have shown almost 40 per cent of loan applications completed through mortgage brokers contained at least one factually incorrect statement. Whether mortgage brokers are providing lenders with incorrect information, or information that is out-of-date, they are putting themselves – and their clients – at risk. A recent study conducted by the Consumer Credit Legal Centre in New South Wales identified some mortgage brokers were breaking the law when filling out loan applications for their clients. Common examples included brokers suggesting their clients provide a different answer...

Planning desk close up documentresize
Consumer and the Law
How to lodge a complaint with Australian Financial Complaints Authority

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) acts as the middleperson between financial firms and consumers or small businesses, offering free and independent dispute resolution services. It deals with complaints about financial advice, insurance, banking and superannuation products and services. While the time limit to lodge a complaint to AFCA is usually between two and six years, the Australian Government recently created the opportunity for those with complaints up to 10 years old to come forward. This means consumers and small businesses have until 30 June 2020 to lodge complaints dating back to 1 January 2008. To lodge a complaint, you must follow AFCA’s process. It is...

How to lodge a complaint with Australian Financial Complaints Authority
Business Law
Proposed Changes to the Franchising Code of Conduct

Franchising is big business in Australia, with approximately 1,120 franchise systems and 79,000 franchise units operating nationally1. As franchising is a diverse sector with characteristics that are unique from other business models, franchises are governed by a mandatory Franchising Code of Conduct (Franchising Code).2 The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services recently completed an inquiry into the operation and effectiveness of the Franchising Code and has released the Fairness in Franchising Report (Report).3 Some of the key findings and recommendations of the report are discussed below. The Committee recommends that the Australian Government establish an...

Waitress In Black Apron Upload

We're here to help

Start your online claim check now. Or, if you have a question, get in touch with our team.