You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox

Age Discrimination

Appointing an attorney is an action that should be carefully considered. An appointed attorney owes fiduciary duties to the person who appointed them (the donor).

Fiduciary duties require the attorney to act in the best interests of the donor, to avoid conflicts of interest and to effect the donor’s wishes to the extent possible. However, the power of the attorney to deal with the donor’s finances is open to abuse – particularly where an older person is unable to monitor their own financial position. It can also be a result of the attorney being unaware of their obligations.

Slater and Gordon has acted in abuse of trust cases which have included:

  • where an attorney has withdrawn funds from the donor’s bank account for their own personal use or has transferred property from the donor to the attorney (or third persons);
  • using the donor’s funds to renovate the attorney’s home; and
  • selling down a donor’s share portfolio to pay for the attorney’s living expenses or acting contrary to the donor’s express wishes.

Each of these examples is an actionable breach of trust, and legal proceedings can be brought against the attorney. In our experience, this type of elder financial abuse is often identified when a family member, bank teller, nurse or other carer becomes concerned about an older person’s finances. Sometimes it only comes to light when the older person’s finances have become so dire that they can’t pay nursing home or utility bills.

Older people and their family members should seek advice if they are or become concerned about their financial situation or the actions of an attorney. The following legal issues often arise in these circumstances:

  • Actions can be taken under guardianship legislation which exists in various forms in all jurisdictions. Guardianship legislation generally allows applications to be made to the relevant state Tribunal to revoke the appointment of an attorney, or to investigate an attorney and to require them to account for their actions.
  • The relevant Tribunal generally does not have the power to order repayment of misappropriated funds. Court proceedings against an attorney may be required to recover funds.
  • Where property is transferred, investigations into the status of the title should be made. If a property is held as joint tenants with an older person, it may be appropriate as a first step to sever the joint tenancy. Court proceedings can be brought to overturn the transfer of title in some instances.
  • Broader claims of unconscionable conduct or undue influence may exist in circumstances where financial abuse is perpetuated by a person who is not a duly appointed attorney.

If you have any concerns about you or a family member’s financial situation or the actions of an attorney, contact us by completing the enquiry form below to speak to one of our experienced lawyers.

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

Thank you for your feedback.

Related blog posts

Consumer and the Law
Liar loans: how mortgage brokers are putting clients at risk

The term ‘liar loans’ has been coined on the back of the Banking Royal Commission. This is because studies have shown almost 40 per cent of loan applications completed through mortgage brokers contained at least one factually incorrect statement. Whether mortgage brokers are providing lenders with incorrect information, or information that is out-of-date, they are putting themselves – and their clients – at risk. A recent study conducted by the Consumer Credit Legal Centre in New South Wales identified some mortgage brokers were breaking the law when filling out loan applications for their clients. Common examples included brokers suggesting their clients provide a different answer...

Planning desk close up documentresize
Consumer and the Law
How to lodge a complaint with Australian Financial Complaints Authority

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) acts as the middleperson between financial firms and consumers or small businesses, offering free and independent dispute resolution services. It deals with complaints about financial advice, insurance, banking and superannuation products and services. While the time limit to lodge a complaint to AFCA is usually between two and six years, the Australian Government recently created the opportunity for those with complaints up to 10 years old to come forward. This means consumers and small businesses have until 30 June 2020 to lodge complaints dating back to 1 January 2008. To lodge a complaint, you must follow AFCA’s process. It is...

How to lodge a complaint with Australian Financial Complaints Authority
Business Law
Proposed Changes to the Franchising Code of Conduct

Franchising is big business in Australia, with approximately 1,120 franchise systems and 79,000 franchise units operating nationally1. As franchising is a diverse sector with characteristics that are unique from other business models, franchises are governed by a mandatory Franchising Code of Conduct (Franchising Code).2 The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services recently completed an inquiry into the operation and effectiveness of the Franchising Code and has released the Fairness in Franchising Report (Report).3 Some of the key findings and recommendations of the report are discussed below. The Committee recommends that the Australian Government establish an...

Waitress In Black Apron Upload

We're here to help

Start your online claim check now. Or, if you have a question, get in touch with our team.