You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox


Elder financial abuse in Australia is on the rise.

Elder financial abuse is where an older person’s money, property or assets are taken or misused by a trusted friend or family member. The most vulnerable are those with impaired capacity, or who are isolated, dependent or where English is a second language. Often by the time help is sought it can be too late, with the elderly person’s money or assets already gone.

A recent example was where Slater and Gordon recently acted for a blind elderly man, whose carer withdrew over $1.4 million in cash from his bank account without his knowledge. While our client signed cheques and withdrawal slips willingly he had been told by his carer that those documents were to pay his Council rates and other bills.

His carer used the cash to fund a gambling habit. While it is likely the carer will be charged with criminal offences, Slater and Gordon was asked to assist him to recoup his losses. We issued proceedings against his bank and settled out of court on a confidential basis. The proceeding gave rise to interesting legal questions.

Elder financial abuse and the banker/customer relationship

The banker/customer relationship is a strictly contractual relationship. Banks are not obliged to protect their customers from financial abuse, nor is there any responsibility on a bank to question how a customer chooses to use their money. The relationship is strictly one of contract – the customer deposits money, and if the bank is provided with an instruction or authority for the money to be paid out or withdrawn the bank must honour that mandate. In our client’s situation, the Bank’s defence was that it had been presented with signed cheques and withdrawal slips and had a mandate to payout the cash.

Banks are also subject to financial regulation. That regulation (among other things) imposes a duty on a bank to investigate potential instances of money laundering. In Australia, financial institutions are required to report suspicious cash transactions over $10,000 to AUSTRAC which is the anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism regulator.

In our client’s circumstances, his dealings on the account changed significantly during the period that his carer was withdrawing cash. Prior to that period, he drew modest amounts of cash to fund his living expenses. His carer was cashing thousands of dollars worth of cheques each day, and on many occasions over $10,000 worth of cash.

Although the case did not proceed to determination by the Courts, the circumstances raised significant questions as to how a bank ought deal with instances where it is known or suspected that an older person is being taken advantage of financially. The Australian Bankers’ Association has recently published a financial abuse protection package which is a welcome development. The package provides guidelines to banks explaining what financial abuse can look like, and how bank staff can respond.

For more information, visit our Elder Financial Abuse page.

Thank you for your feedback.

Related blog posts

Consumer and the Law
Liar loans: how mortgage brokers are putting clients at risk

The term ‘liar loans’ has been coined on the back of the Banking Royal Commission. This is because studies have shown almost 40 per cent of loan applications completed through mortgage brokers contained at least one factually incorrect statement. Whether mortgage brokers are providing lenders with incorrect information, or information that is out-of-date, they are putting themselves – and their clients – at risk. A recent study conducted by the Consumer Credit Legal Centre in New South Wales identified some mortgage brokers were breaking the law when filling out loan applications for their clients. Common examples included brokers suggesting their clients provide a different answer...

Planning desk close up documentresize
Consumer and the Law
How to lodge a complaint with Australian Financial Complaints Authority

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) acts as the middleperson between financial firms and consumers or small businesses, offering free and independent dispute resolution services. It deals with complaints about financial advice, insurance, banking and superannuation products and services. While the time limit to lodge a complaint to AFCA is usually between two and six years, the Australian Government recently created the opportunity for those with complaints up to 10 years old to come forward. This means consumers and small businesses have until 30 June 2020 to lodge complaints dating back to 1 January 2008. To lodge a complaint, you must follow AFCA’s process. It is...

How to lodge a complaint with Australian Financial Complaints Authority
Business Law
Proposed Changes to the Franchising Code of Conduct

Franchising is big business in Australia, with approximately 1,120 franchise systems and 79,000 franchise units operating nationally1. As franchising is a diverse sector with characteristics that are unique from other business models, franchises are governed by a mandatory Franchising Code of Conduct (Franchising Code).2 The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services recently completed an inquiry into the operation and effectiveness of the Franchising Code and has released the Fairness in Franchising Report (Report).3 Some of the key findings and recommendations of the report are discussed below. The Committee recommends that the Australian Government establish an...

Waitress In Black Apron Upload

We're here to help

Start your online claim check now. Or, if you have a question, get in touch with our team.