You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox

Slater and Gordon are continuing to service the community during the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Click here for more info

Shutterstock 1379418986 Reszied

In light of the revelations regarding an unlicenced and unsupervised minor posing as an apprentice while doing electrical work and the recent sweep to check licences on the Gold Coast, it’s clear that a tick a box attitude to safety on worksites is still prevalent.

Younger workers are at risk of being hurt on worksites due to unsafe work practices. It doesn’t help that companies are ignoring basic building and safety standards designed to protect people.

Recent news coverage of the safety blitz on the Gold Coast highlighted the tragic electrocution of a 20-year-old at a Clermont worksite after just nine days on the job in 2012.

Deaths like this are felt throughout all of the community. No one should have to send their son or daughter to work only to lose them through the negligence of cost cutting employers.

However, statistics show that the majority of deaths at work occur in the older worker age group between the ages of 45-54.

In my line of work, I see the effects of injuries and deaths on a daily basis and I also see the cause and how incidents could have been prevented.

There is a consistent theme where we hear: ‘yes there are safety procedures and manuals and there is a safe way it should have been done, but in practice we never do it that way’.

There is often a dismissive acknowledgement or nod to safety but a general attitude that the good workers just get the job done.

This attitude is what leads to deaths within this age group of workers. This demographic is four to 10 times more likely to die or be seriously injured on the job than the younger workers.

There needs to be proper training for new young workers but there also needs to be a focus on the reality which is, it is more likely that the older worker who has done the job for years will be the one suffering the most from these lapses in safety.

The older worker is also aware that if they complain, they may struggle more to get a job if they need to move on.

The financial consequences to them being injured can be catastrophic.

It is incumbent on employers and the State Government to ensure that these older workers who don’t have youth on their side, as well as the younger ones who don’t have the luxury of experience aren’t exploited.

The tragedy is that it is more often than not the best workers who ‘just get in and get it done’ who suffer.

If you have sustained a workplace injury, you can find out more about workers’ compensation schemes and benefits at our Workers’ Compensation page.

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

Thank you for your feedback.

We're here to help

Get in touch with our Workers Compensation team

Related blog posts

Compensation Law
30 years of the NSW Dust Diseases Tribunal

On 1 November 1989 Judge John O’Meally sat for the first time in the New South Wales Dust Diseases Tribunal (the “Tribunal”) when it heard its first case. This month, during Asbestos Awareness Month the Tribunal celebrated 30 years of operation. The Tribunal was created by the NSW Parliament after years of long delays in the Supreme Court and District Court which often saw plaintiffs suffering from dust diseases die before their cases could be heard. During the Second Reading Speech on 3 May 1989, Mr Dowd, the then NSW Attorney General said: Honourable members will be aware of the considerable delays that exist in the common law jurisdictions of both the Supreme Court and the...

Asbestos danger sign
Compensation Law
Is it legal to flash your headlights?

You know the old Aussie tradition: see a cop car or unmarked speed camera and flash your headlights to warn other drivers. But is it legal? And when can you use your headlights legally? We give you the basics. The legal purpose of headlights According to Section 215 of the Australian Road Rules (2006), low-beam headlights must be used for driving at night or in hazardous conditions that cause reduced visibility – playing a clear role in avoiding and preventing accidents. In fact, since the introduction of daytime running lamps (DRL) on vehicles in Australia, there has been a reduction of multiple vehicle injury accidents by up to 20 per cent and a reduction of fatal pedestrian accidents...

Car Headlights 628X290
Compensation Law
Abuse law and understanding the National Redress Scheme

The high-profile trial of Cardinal George Pell and his application for leave to appeal against the convictions being accepted by the High Court, as well as the Royal Commission in recent years, have shined a light on sex abuse in Australia. Bravehearts Foundation provides advice and support to those affected by child sexual assault. They provide child protection training and education programs, specialist child sexual assault counselling and support services. We have formed an alliance with Bravehearts Foundation who work very hard to prevent child sexual assault in our society. We have also linked up with Knowmore, who provide legal advice to abuse survivors by arming them with information...