You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox


He seemed like he knew what he was talking about. Confident too. Besides, he’s backed by one of the biggest banks in Australia. You can’t get safer than that. Right?

And just like that, you’ve signed over your entire retirement nest egg to a guy you’ve met once, maybe twice.

The recent slew of financial advice scandals has underscored the need for consumers to be more vigilant and pro-active in checking up on their financial advisers, before appointing them and committing to any recommended investments.

On 31 March 2015, ASIC launched its Financial Advisers Register, which will make it easier for consumers to do this. The Register, found on the ASIC’s Moneysmart website, contains the names and key details of any person who is able to give personal financial advice in Australia.

The information on the Register currently includes:

  • the adviser’s name, registration number, status and experience
  • the adviser’s current licensee (the responsible company which holds the licence from ASIC permitting it and its representatives to give financial advice), and any previous licensees
  • what product areas the adviser can provide advice on
  • any bans or disqualifications
  • details about who controls the licensee and any ultimate parent company

From May 2015, the Register will also include information about the adviser’s qualifications and professional association memberships.

The Register covers anyone who is allowed to give personal financial advice in Australia. Previously, you could only search for some of this information on ASIC’s website in relation to an “authorised representative” – a person who is authorised to give financial advice under a particular legislative procedure. This did not necessarily include financial advisers who were permitted to give advice because they were an employee or a director of a financial services licensee company.

The Register is also much easier to use than ASIC’s main website, requiring you only to enter a name, adviser number or ABN into a single search box.

If you are thinking about getting financial advice, you should consider checking your adviser’s name on the Register as an absolutely essential step before committing to anything, or signing any documents. It will take you less than a minute to Google the Register, enter the adviser’s name and view the results. Any of the following should sound warning bells:

  • you cannot find the adviser’s name on the Register
  • the adviser has a record of bans, disqualifications or other disciplinary issues
  • the adviser is not permitted to give you advice about the particular financial products you have discussed with them
  • the adviser is inexperienced or has represented many different licensees (this is not necessarily indicative of any misconduct, but you should ask why they have moved around so much).

Finally, although the risk of fines, offence provisions and loss of reputation will encourage financial advisers to provide truthful and up to date information to ASIC, there is no guarantee the information on the Register is correct.

Therefore, while the Register is a good starting point, you should not solely rely on it in deciding whether to proceed with an adviser or their recommendations. ASIC’s Moneysmart website also contains helpful guides on what to consider before proceeding with any financial advice.

Search the Register here.

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

Thank you for your feedback.

Related blog posts

Consumer and the Law
Banking Royal Commission legislation introduced

On 28 November 2019, the Government introduced legislation in line with the recommendations of the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry. The legislation is designed to provide further protections for consumers and small businesses and is set to be passed in early 2020. Below is an overview of the proposed legislation. Click here for a recap of the Banking Royal Commission from our Head of Class Actions, Ben Hardwick. Under the proposed legislation, mortgage brokers will be required to act in the best interests of consumers when providing credit assistance. That means where there is a conflict of interest between the consumer’s...

Gavel and weights two people talking resized
Financial Negligence
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority’s powers are being expanded for 12 months: Do you …

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) is responsible for providing consumers and small businesses with free and independent dispute resolution for financial complaints. AFCA considers complaints in relation to: These complaints were previously handled by the Financial Ombudsman Service, the Credit and Investments Ombudsman and the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal. The usual time limit for making a complaint to AFCA is 6 years from the date you became aware of the financial loss.[1] However, when a complaint has already been through the financial firm’s internal dispute resolution process, the time limit is reduced to 2 years from the date you receive response from the...

Finance Planning People Documents Resized
Financial Negligence
Online scams and the Financial Ombudsmen service

As our population ages, our vulnerable elderly people are increasingly falling victim to elder abuse perpetrated by adult children, family members, friends and carers. But older Australians are also increasingly preyed upon by fraudsters. The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) has recently published two determinations which consider whether the older person’s bank is liable for “allowing” them to transfer funds. In the first case (Case number 431342, 2 December 2016), the Applicant transferred $123,019 from his bank account to a fraudster who kept the funds. The Applicant claimed the bank should compensate him for his loss. FOS found, however, that the bank did not cause or contribute...

We're here to help

Start your online claim check now. Or, if you have a question, get in touch with our team.