You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox

Slater and Gordon are continuing to service the community during the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Click here for more info


When a financial adviser recommends switching superannuation funds they are required to give you specific information and if they fail to do so this can constitute professional negligence and entitle you to compensation if the switch results in you suffering financial loss.

Specifically, the advisor must tell you about:

  • Charges you may incur in respect of the disposal/reduction and acquisition/increase;
  • Benefits you may lose as a result of taking the recommended action;
  • Information about any other likely significant consequences for you; and
  • An explanation of why the change is appropriate for you.

Each of these required disclosures must be provided in a written document called a Statement of Advice which sets out the adviser’s recommendations as well as the particular information required when an adviser recommends a switch.

A financial adviser should take reasonable steps to find out the necessary information, such as asking you for details of your current superannuation and completing research. If the financial adviser does not know, and cannot reasonably find out the necessary information, the Statement of Advice must specifically tell you that.

Charges you may incur

The Statement of Advice should include, among other things, information about any exit fees applying to withdrawal from your existing superannuation fund and any entry and ongoing fees applying to the proposed superannuation fund. Additionally, the Statement of Advice must make clear the adviser has considered your existing superannuation fund.

Benefits you may lose

This requires the adviser to consider and investigate both your existing superannuation fund and the proposed superannuation fund and notify you of any benefits you may lose as result of switching. For example, if the proposed superannuation fund is different in respect of ‘capital security’ than your existing superannuation fund, the adviser must explain this difference to you. There might also be changes to the extent or level of insurance cover you will receive within an alternative superannuation fund. These cases should be both in discussion with you, and detailed in the Statement of Advice

It is insufficient for these disclosures to be overly general or noncommittal in nature. For example, it is inadequate for the adviser to tell you there “may” be a change in the level of investment risk without specifically pointing out if the proposed switch is from a low risk investment option to one with greater risk.

Information about significant consequences

Significant consequences are, broadly speaking, the significant differences between your existing superannuation fund and the proposed superannuation fund that the adviser knows are important to you. For example, it is a ‘significant consequence’ if the recommended investment option is riskier than your existing investment option. Similarly, the loss of comparable insurance cover within a recommended fund amounts to a significant difference. The adviser should provide a comparison of risks in the Statement of Advice. It is not enough for the advisor to just identify the risks of the proposed superannuation fund, these need to be compared with your existing superannuation fund.

Why the change is appropriate

The Financial Planning Association of Australia Rules of Professional Conduct state:

A member shall not move a client or cause a client to move from an investment to another investment without explanation to the client, in terms the client is likely to understand, the reason for the move. The member must demonstrate that the move is appropriate for the client."

It is not enough for an adviser to tell you the proposed superannuation fund is appropriate for you; the adviser should also tell you why it is more appropriate than your existing superannuation, for example because of lower fees.

Remember, while it is your financial adviser’s responsibility to provide you with the detailed disclosures discussed above, it is your responsibility read the Statement of Advice and ask your adviser any questions you have, before you make the switch.

If you are concerned that you have acted on financial advice that was not appropriate for you and has caused you financial loss contact us to speak to one of our experienced lawyers about your options.

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

Thank you for your feedback.

Related blog posts

Consumer and the Law
Banking Royal Commission legislation introduced

On 28 November 2019, the Government introduced legislation in line with the recommendations of the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry. The legislation is designed to provide further protections for consumers and small businesses and is set to be passed in early 2020. Below is an overview of the proposed legislation. Click here for a recap of the Banking Royal Commission from our Head of Class Actions, Ben Hardwick. Under the proposed legislation, mortgage brokers will be required to act in the best interests of consumers when providing credit assistance. That means where there is a conflict of interest between the consumer’s...

Gavel and weights two people talking resized
Financial Negligence
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority’s powers are being expanded for 12 months: Do you …

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) is responsible for providing consumers and small businesses with free and independent dispute resolution for financial complaints. AFCA considers complaints in relation to: These complaints were previously handled by the Financial Ombudsman Service, the Credit and Investments Ombudsman and the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal. The usual time limit for making a complaint to AFCA is 6 years from the date you became aware of the financial loss.[1] However, when a complaint has already been through the financial firm’s internal dispute resolution process, the time limit is reduced to 2 years from the date you receive response from the...

Finance Planning People Documents Resized
Financial Negligence
Online scams and the Financial Ombudsmen service

As our population ages, our vulnerable elderly people are increasingly falling victim to elder abuse perpetrated by adult children, family members, friends and carers. But older Australians are also increasingly preyed upon by fraudsters. The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) has recently published two determinations which consider whether the older person’s bank is liable for “allowing” them to transfer funds. In the first case (Case number 431342, 2 December 2016), the Applicant transferred $123,019 from his bank account to a fraudster who kept the funds. The Applicant claimed the bank should compensate him for his loss. FOS found, however, that the bank did not cause or contribute...

We're here to help

Start your online claim check now. Or, if you have a question, get in touch with our team.