You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox

Img 9901 Cropped

In Ok Tedi - Entering Uncharted Territory we took a look back in Slater and Gordon's history at the David and Goliath battle between a group of Papua New Guinea Villagers and the Australian mining giant BHP. In this article John Gordon, now a respected Barrister, reflects on the case.

In the words of John Gordon

The Ok Tedi litigation against BHP was important in many ways, and I think the lessons have become even more important as time passes. BHP had got away with dumping mine waste, cyanide and tailings into the river system for many years.

By the time we got involved the upper Ok Tedi river was destroyed, the gardens and crops of the lower Ok Tedi villages were being covered in tailings and mud and the entire Fly River ecosystem was under threat.

But it was in a remote part of the world away from the scrutiny of Australian media. But the loss of food and tradition and lifestyle was very real to the villagers living there. Their agitations had been ignored in Port Moresby and in Melbourne.

So Slater and Gordon, hand in hand with the Ok Tedi and Fly River people, bravely took on one of the world’s biggest mining companies and the PNG government, and chose to do so in the Supreme Court of Victoria in the full glare of the Australian media and the court of public opinion.

A villager even laid a dead fish at the feet of the BHP board at its AGM.

BHP was found in contempt of court for drafting legislation for the PNG government to criminalise the villagers and their lawyers for bringing their legitimate claims. Its share price crashed.

I was illegally detained in custody at Port Moresby airport when I went to consult with our clients and the writ of habeas corpus served on the PNG officials, to have me released, was filmed by the ABC cameras being screwed in a ball and blowing across the airport car park.

Threats, then inducements, were made to our clients to stop them bringing their claims. Multiple strike-out actions were brought against the claims.

Eventually when it was clear that we had survived the onslaught and the cases were going to trial, and with scrutiny coming on to its other projects in South America and Canada, BHP surrendered and paid $110 million to the affected people, set up a trust for them, agreed to dredge the river and undertook to examine ways of getting the tailings out of the river permanently.

BHP eventually withdrew entirely from Ok Tedi and gave its interest to the people of the Ok Tedi and Fly River. Never again would Australian mining companies be able to act as they wished in developing nations. They were now accountable to the Australian people and in Australian law.

The fight by Slater and Gordon and the villagers of the Ok Tedi had been risky, brave, expensive and hard. But it had been just. Thousands of people who had been ignored for so long were empowered and given access to justice, compensation and a better future.

Thank you for your feedback.

Latest blog posts

Featured
Ok Tedi - Entering uncharted territory

When John Gordon got a phone call from an old law-school mate one May day in 1992, he hardly imagined it could change the course of history. John was manager of Slater and Gordon’s Perth office. His old friend was a solicitor in Port Moresby who had been approached by a group of highland villagers to sue the Australian mining giant BHP. The potential legal battle loomed too large for any Papua New Guinea firm. And so, Slater and Gordon stepped into uncharted territory. A decade earlier BHP had bought the mining rights to Ok Tedi, a rain-drenched slice of PNG rich in gold and copper ore. It then set up Ok Tedi Mining Limited to mine the once-sacred site. The company had handed a 20 per...

Shutterstock 1100781824 Cropped
Featured
Anzac Day – A history of service

The significance of Anzac Day runs deep through the veins of Slater and Gordon as both our founding fathers William (Bill) Slater and Hugh Gordon served their country, Bill in WW I and Hugh in WW II. This Anzac Day, we pay tribute to their service and to the service of others at the Firm. As European armies began to move in 1914, William (Bill) Slater struggled with his conscience. He hated war, but death loomed over his generation; how could he stay at home while the world was falling apart? He reached a compromise with himself and volunteered to join the Australian Field Ambulance and was shipped to Northern France in 1916 to join the horrific trench warfare of the Western Front. During...

Fb Anzac Day Apr17 V2 0
Featured
Determining Legal Capacity - Health Professionals

As a medical professional, you are charged with a profound responsibility. People come to you for your expertise, and authoritative advice, in a complex and expansive field. However, in some circumstances an adult may choose to refuse your advice, and any medical treatment or medication you recommend, which is acceptable providing that: This ability to make informed decisions and deal with their own affairs is known as an individual’s ‘legal capacity’ and in this article, we’ll give you an overview – or a refresher – of that concept. What we’re talking about here is not a principle of medicine or health, but a principle of law. And the base principle of law at the heart of...

Istock 499664559 Blog

We're here to help

Start your online claim check now. Or, if you have a question, get in touch with our team.