You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox


An ASIC review into bad advice in the life insurance industry confirms what our clients have been telling us for years, many insurance advisers don’t properly explain their advice to their clients.

ASIC’s review of a sample of advice files found more than a third of customers received advice so bad it was unlawful. ASIC said that its results indicated that many advisers giving post-FOFA advice may have prioritised their own interests in earning commission income ahead of the interests of the client in getting good quality advice.

In my years of acting for clients who have received bad advice from their insurer, I’ve found that many advisers don’t properly explain the catches hidden in the fine print of some of the policies they are selling.

Many people don’t realise that switching insurers can increase the risk of losing insurance cover entirely, or of having a policy cancelled later. Switching insurers increases the risk that a claim will be rejected for a pre-existing condition, and also increases the risk that a policy will be cancelled for non-disclosure of some aspect of a customer’s medical history.

The ASIC report also found advisors gave ‘too many generic warnings that were insufficient to engage the client in understanding’ the risks of switching insurers.

In some instances, advisers sell unsuitable insurance policies motivated by the commissions they get paid. This is a huge problem in the industry and in the end, it is the insurance consumer who suffers.

Life insurance customers can protect themselves by asking their insurance advisors some key questions:-

  1. How much will you be paid if I sign up to this policy?
  2. Is there a comparable, cheaper policy? If so, how much would you be paid if I bought that policy, and why are you not recommending it?
  3. Can you give me a quote for the same amount of cover with at least three different insurers?
  4. Why are you recommending this policy, rather than another insurer’s policy?
  5. What do I have to prove to be paid the benefit?
  6. What are the exclusions?
  7. What are the risks of me signing up to this policy?
  8. Will my premiums go up over time? How much by?

Insurance advisors have a duty of care to their customers, and customers who are given bad advice may have an action against their advisor, or their insurer.

For more information, visit Superannuation and Insurance claims.

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

Thank you for your feedback.

Related blog posts

Consumer and the Law
Banking Royal Commission legislation introduced

On 28 November 2019, the Government introduced legislation in line with the recommendations of the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry. The legislation is designed to provide further protections for consumers and small businesses and is set to be passed in early 2020. Below is an overview of the proposed legislation. Click here for a recap of the Banking Royal Commission from our Head of Class Actions, Ben Hardwick. Under the proposed legislation, mortgage brokers will be required to act in the best interests of consumers when providing credit assistance. That means where there is a conflict of interest between the consumer’s...

Gavel and weights two people talking resized
Superannuation and Insurance
An end to for-profit Super funds?

A lot has been said and written about the Productivity Commission’s ground-breaking report into the efficiency and competitiveness (or lack thereof) of the superannuation industry since it was publically released a few weeks ago. Surprisingly however, one of the Commission’s 31 recommendations appears to have attracted no attention, despite the significant implications it would have for one prominent part of the industry: retail (or for-profit) super funds. The Commission recommended that all fees charged by APRA-regulated superannuation funds should be levied on a cost-recovery basis. The Commission reasoned that because super funds are legally obliged to act in members’ best...

Piggybank
Superannuation and Insurance
Under performance of retail Super funds confirmed

The Productivity Commissions’ final report into the superannuation system released today found the current system is “harming millions of members” with underperforming funds, multiple accounts and excessive fees. On 10 January 2019, the Productivity Commission released its final report into the superannuation system. Much like the Banking Royal Commission, the final report is particularly critical of the retail sector, both for underperformance and exorbitant fees. The final report found a significant number of super products were underperforming and that “most (but not all) affected members are in retail funds.” The report found that 77% of 5 million underperforming super...

Investment Statement Cropped

We're here to help

Start your online claim check now. Or, if you have a question, get in touch with our team.