You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox


If you are suffering hardship because your property is earmarked for future compulsory acquisition, you may be able to have the relevant Authority purchase your property immediately.

Legislation throughout Australia permits Government and other authorities to compulsorily acquire property from private owners for public purposes such as roads and other infrastructure projects. That legislation sets out a formal regime for compensating owners for the value of their land and associated expenses. Acquiring authorities may also acquire property by negotiation.

While major projects will be planned and announced many years in advance, acquisitions by the relevant authority usually only occur a short time before actual construction commences.

In the meantime, some property owners may find themselves in a very difficult position where they need to sell their property immediately but are unable to do so because potential buyers run a mile once they realise the property will be affected by the future development.

The problem is not just limited to home owners, but also property developers whose plans have become unviable due to planning restrictions associated with future development or owners seeking to use their property as security for a loan who find the value of the property is now significantly reduced.

A solution

Various legislation and departmental policies provide that, in cases of hardship, the acquiring authority may agree to the early acquisition of such properties and payment of associated expenses such as legal fees, valuation fees and the costs of acquiring a replacement property.

To qualify, an owner will generally need to demonstrate:

  • their property has been identified, with a high degree of certainty, as required for a public purpose;
  • they have attempted to sell the property at fair market value but have been unable to do so because of the property’s designation as required for a public purpose;
  • it has become necessary for the owner to sell the land without delay due:
  • to pressing personal, domestic or social reasons (for example, serious illness or employment transfer); or
  • to avoid loss of income or substantial reduction in income;
  • where applicable, the value of the property as security for a loan has been impaired as a result of the property’s designation as required for a public purpose.

Property developers will generally need to demonstrate their proposed development has become unviable due to the proposed public project or:

  • because development approval has been refused, or will likely be refused, due to the future public requirement;
  • because of conditions applied to their development approval due to the proposed public project.

How to improve your chances

To conserve financial resources, public authorities generally will not acquire properties until just before they are needed.

The more clearly you can demonstrate your special circumstances of hardship, and inability to sell due to the proposed public project, the better your chances of having your property acquired ‘ahead of the pack’.

Compensation paid by acquiring authorities under hardship applications usually mirrors the compensation which is available to property owners under formal compulsory acquisition legislation. In our experience, this compensation can be much more than the owners initially believe they are entitled to.

As reasonable legal costs are usually paid by the acquiring authority, it is worth engaging an experienced lawyer to advise you on what evidence you will need to stand the best chance of having the authority agree to an early acquisition and to formulate your compensation claim to ensure you claim the maximum amount.

Learn more about our land and compulsory acquisition services here.

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

Thank you for your feedback.

Related blog posts

Consumer and the Law
Liar loans: how mortgage brokers are putting clients at risk

The term ‘liar loans’ has been coined on the back of the Banking Royal Commission. This is because studies have shown almost 40 per cent of loan applications completed through mortgage brokers contained at least one factually incorrect statement. Whether mortgage brokers are providing lenders with incorrect information, or information that is out-of-date, they are putting themselves – and their clients – at risk. A recent study conducted by the Consumer Credit Legal Centre in New South Wales identified some mortgage brokers were breaking the law when filling out loan applications for their clients. Common examples included brokers suggesting their clients provide a different answer...

Planning desk close up documentresize
Consumer and the Law
How to lodge a complaint with Australian Financial Complaints Authority

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) acts as the middleperson between financial firms and consumers or small businesses, offering free and independent dispute resolution services. It deals with complaints about financial advice, insurance, banking and superannuation products and services. While the time limit to lodge a complaint to AFCA is usually between two and six years, the Australian Government recently created the opportunity for those with complaints up to 10 years old to come forward. This means consumers and small businesses have until 30 June 2020 to lodge complaints dating back to 1 January 2008. To lodge a complaint, you must follow AFCA’s process. It is...

How to lodge a complaint with Australian Financial Complaints Authority
Business Law
Proposed Changes to the Franchising Code of Conduct

Franchising is big business in Australia, with approximately 1,120 franchise systems and 79,000 franchise units operating nationally1. As franchising is a diverse sector with characteristics that are unique from other business models, franchises are governed by a mandatory Franchising Code of Conduct (Franchising Code).2 The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services recently completed an inquiry into the operation and effectiveness of the Franchising Code and has released the Fairness in Franchising Report (Report).3 Some of the key findings and recommendations of the report are discussed below. The Committee recommends that the Australian Government establish an...

Waitress In Black Apron Upload

We're here to help

Start your online claim check now. Or, if you have a question, get in touch with our team.