×

We’ve noticed that you’re using an unsupported browser,
which may result in pages displaying incorrectly.

For a better viewing experience, we recommend upgrading to the latest browser version of:

Skip to main content
Are you in QLD?

Please select your location to view information that is specific to you.

Menu
Call Call 1800 555 777
1800 555 777
or let us call you

Let Us Call You

Close

A - Anton Piller Order

in A-Z of Legal Jargon by Andy Munro on

Ever heard of an Anton Piller Order?

In Court proceedings, often times the parties involved don’t have all the documents they need in order to prove their case. For that reason, subpoenas can be issued, which compel the person or company on the receiving end to produce documents to court. However, not everyone complies with subpoenas, despite them being an order of the court.  It is not unknown for documents to quickly find their way into the shredder, and for computer hard drives to be erased.

In those situations, it can be important to move quickly, and secretively, so as not to alert your target.  The court has the power to make an Anton Piller order (or rather, as it is now known in NSW, a “search order”) that permits an appointed person (often in the company of an officer from the NSW Sheriff) to enter private premises and seize documents, computers, and other material relevant to the case.  Since such an order involves the invasion of another’s privacy, a person applying for an Anton Piller order will need to prove that there is a real possibility that evidence will be destroyed.

The name comes from the English decision of Anton Piller KG v Manufacturing Processes Ltd [1976] Ch 55.

Connect with Andy on LinkedIn

Have your say