You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox

Slater and Gordon are continuing to service the community during the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Click here for more info


Is your financial advisor providing you with appropriate advice or just trying to make a quick sale to generate fees and commissions?

Under Australian law, financial advisors are required to provide retail clients with advice which is appropriate. This means the advisor must carry out reasonable enquiries about the client’s personal circumstances, goals and tolerance for risk, and provide advice which is tailored for each individual client’s situation.

Because everyone is different, this all takes time.

A good financial advisor will not rush you, but will take the time to properly understand your situation, discuss the pros and cons of various investment strategies and alternatives available to you, educate you about the relevant issues and make sure you appreciate the implications of your proposed course of action, so you can make an informed decision.

Unfortunately of late, the financial advice industry has been frequently criticised for its ‘sales culture’ with certain unscrupulous advisers more interested in making quick (and substantial) fees and commissions than providing appropriate advice. Here are three statements from your financial advisor which should sound warning bells.

“I am invested in the same thing.” (a.k.a “My mother/brother/relative is invested in the same thing”)

Remember, the advisor is required to give you advice in relation to your individual situation. Just because the advisor says he/she has invested in a particular financial product, or has advised his relatives to do likewise, does not mean that you should too, or that it is a financial product which is appropriate for you.

Disregard, and ask the advisor to explain why what they are recommending is appropriate for you.

“This document just covers what we talked about.”

Financial advisors are generally required to provide their clients with a written Statement of Advice (“SOA”). This is supposed to be a document which explains the advice in plain English so the client can decide whether to rely on it and proceed with the investment.

Many clients feel overwhelmed by the length and complexity of the SOA they receive, so when an advisor tells them there is no need to read it because it just covers what was previously discussed, they gladly agree.

In reality, the SOA may contain a lot more including:

  • assumptions which the advisor has made, which may be incorrect (e.g. “We assume there has been no change to your personal circumstances since the last time we gave you advice”);
  • warnings and disclaimers which may be inconsistent with what the advisor has told you in prior discussions (e.g. the investment will not be capital secure or that there is significant risk involved);
  • statements which give a false account of your instructions (for example “You instructed us you wanted to engage in a gearing strategy (borrowing to invest)”, when in reality it was the advisor, not the client, who brought up the idea of gearing).

No matter how long it is, investors should read their SOA thoroughly before signing to ensure they fully understand its contents. Ask questions about any parts you do not understand and, if in doubt, get a second opinion.

“You need to sign this urgently.”

We have all experienced high pressure sales tactics in one form or another. The same can occur when receiving financial advice, particularly when it comes time to sign the necessary documents to proceed with the investment.

Clients may be told by their advisor that an offer for a particular investment is only open to a certain number of investors, or until a certain date. They may be rushed through the investment process without properly understanding what they are doing or the risks involved. The advisor may give you the impression that they are very busy and you are holding them up.

There may, in fact, be no real reason to hurry through the process. You are probably investing thousands of dollars. Maybe even your life savings. You owe it to yourself to take the time to understand the proposed investment. If you feel pressured, ask for time to read the documents and schedule a follow up meeting. The advisor with their busy schedule can wait.

Find our more about our Financial Negligence services.

The contents of this blog post are considered accurate as at the date of publication. However the applicable laws may be subject to change, thereby affecting the accuracy of the article. The information contained in this blog post is of a general nature only and is not specific to anyone’s personal circumstances. Please seek legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this post.

Thank you for your feedback.

Related blog posts

Consumer and the Law
Liar loans: how mortgage brokers are putting clients at risk

The term ‘liar loans’ has been coined on the back of the Banking Royal Commission. This is because studies have shown almost 40 per cent of loan applications completed through mortgage brokers contained at least one factually incorrect statement. Whether mortgage brokers are providing lenders with incorrect information, or information that is out-of-date, they are putting themselves – and their clients – at risk. A recent study conducted by the Consumer Credit Legal Centre in New South Wales identified some mortgage brokers were breaking the law when filling out loan applications for their clients. Common examples included brokers suggesting their clients provide a different answer...

Planning desk close up documentresize
Consumer and the Law
How to lodge a complaint with Australian Financial Complaints Authority

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) acts as the middleperson between financial firms and consumers or small businesses, offering free and independent dispute resolution services. It deals with complaints about financial advice, insurance, banking and superannuation products and services. While the time limit to lodge a complaint to AFCA is usually between two and six years, the Australian Government recently created the opportunity for those with complaints up to 10 years old to come forward. This means consumers and small businesses have until 30 June 2020 to lodge complaints dating back to 1 January 2008. To lodge a complaint, you must follow AFCA’s process. It is...

How to lodge a complaint with Australian Financial Complaints Authority
Business Law
Proposed Changes to the Franchising Code of Conduct

Franchising is big business in Australia, with approximately 1,120 franchise systems and 79,000 franchise units operating nationally1. As franchising is a diverse sector with characteristics that are unique from other business models, franchises are governed by a mandatory Franchising Code of Conduct (Franchising Code).2 The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services recently completed an inquiry into the operation and effectiveness of the Franchising Code and has released the Fairness in Franchising Report (Report).3 Some of the key findings and recommendations of the report are discussed below. The Committee recommends that the Australian Government establish an...

Waitress In Black Apron Upload

We're here to help

Start your online claim check now. Or, if you have a question, get in touch with our team.